Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog |
|
| Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 2:50 PM GMT on June 21, 2010 | +6 |



| Permalink | A A A |
|
|
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.
|
Tropical Blogs
Tropical Weather Stickers®
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 — Blog Index
It's been correct all season.
A
No it hasn't. It has had false alarms
ok thanks so this why all the exp moe models have it aiminmg at so fla now it makes more sense they been showing this for sevveral runs now thanks again for explaining
may be the nhc no some in that we dont
What is your basis behind it being a failure? You need something to back up your claim. I'm in the belief that something SHOULD form from all of this mess, but it's not really impressing me too much right now.
Hold it. The curtain must have the proper images. Where did you find them. The number 7 is powerful indeed but without the fish the curtain is powerless.
again it is failing because it doesnt show development?
Remember it beat the ECMWF head to head with 90L and it did very well with 92L
Either way, just because a forecast model doesnt develop something, does not mean it is wrong or out to lunch or crazy
I'm talking about with the invests only. I should have made that clear.
Yes...it's had ghost storms. It had one a few days ago heading for Louisiana.
That's why you had to go to summer school. If you had paid more attention in school, this wouldn't have happened. By the way your spelling has improved greatly.
BP took over the GFS, actually. They are making it downplay development in the Gulf. I figured it out. The EURO told them to F off.
crepe mrtyle would be good.
That wasn't a hurricane and a bunch of other models showed the same thing.
You do realize that 92L had a closed low for about 12 hours, right? Regardless, closed low or not, the system never became a named system and 92L stayed an open wave for the majority of its life (as the GFS suggested).
But at least we were on when history was being made last night. We were witness to a cyclogeneis, not unlike Star Trek II, The Wrath of Khan. Everyone else was so surprised to see 93L. We knew it was coming before anybody else. Doesn't that frost your cookie a little??
Well...either that was quick or the charts can't be trusted.
exactly and the ECMWF developed it for part of the time, I would say both models did a good job with 92L but the GFS did better
I am just tired of always seeing people say the models need to be thrown out if they dont develop something
has of 2:05pm
Link
no that run was the current one he posted
Viewing: 1751 - 1801
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 — Blog Index