Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Invest 95L Brushes Louisiana Coastline
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 12:42 AM GMT on July 06, 2010 +3
Hi all,

Dr. Rob Carver, filling in for Jeff this week.

Midnight CDT Update
The low known as Invest 95L stopped it's northward progression and is now moving west along the Louisiana coastline. This is the oddest mesoscale convective complex/tropical feature I've seen in awhile. It's still producing a lot of rain, 2+ inches inland and 6+ inches over the ocean.


Base reflectivity from Lake Charles, LA at 11PM July 5 showing a very nice comma head. Animated loop.


Invest 95L is making landfall now in southern Louisiana near Terrebonne Bay. A CMAN station in Terrebonne Bay is currently reporting winds from the SE at 21 mph and the pressure is 1009 mb. Looking at the radar data, Invest 95L never had convection around the center of circulation. Also, it was hard to see a distinct surface circulation in the different analyses available. I believe soaking rains for southern Lousisana are going to be Invest 95L's main legacy. It's already produced 5+ inches of rain in some offshore locations according to radar-derived rainfall estimates.


Fig. 1 Meteogram for TRBL1 in Terrebonne Bay, LA. Tabular data are here.


Fig. 2 Base reflectivity from New Orleans, LA at 706PM, July 5. Animated loop.

Invest 96L
430 AM Update
In sum, the 00Z model runs don't present a different picture. It is curious to note that the Canadian Global model does not intensify 96L at all in the 00Z run, while NOGAPS has shifted towards a SE Louisiana landfall. I think the following discussion is still valid.

96L is going to be an interesting feature to forecast. It's still on the edge of a strong wind shear gradient. 40+ knots of shear are on the NE side of 96L, and <10 knots are on the SW side. The "center" of 96L is under about 15 knots of shear. This is likely inhibiting 96L. Nearly all forecast models take 96L NW through the Yucatan peninsula and into the Gulf of Mexico. Near the Yucatan itself, sea-surface temperatures are relatively cool, not the best environment for intensification. However, at 25N, 87W there is a hotspot of SST's, which would promote rapid intensification. However, there's currently 20 knots of shear over the hotspot, so the thunderstorms that do form as a result will be well ventilated, and not cause 96L to intensify.

The dynamical models have different takes on how 96L intensifies in the next 120 hours. The 18Z operational GFS strongly intensifies 96L over the hotspot and takes 96L towards Grand Isle, LA. The parallel (for testing model configuration changes) GFS has a similar track, but does not strengthen 96L as much. This indicates uncertainty on how the models are handling the upper-level winds.

The 18Z HWRF solution is much like the parallel GFS solution. The 12Z Canadian global model has a more westerly track, pushing 96L towards Port Arthur, but it strengthens 96L right before it makes landfall, not when it's over open water. NOGAPS takes the "a little from column A, a little from column B" approach, with a spinup over the hotspot (op. GFS solution), but a westerly landfall (the Canadian solution). More data to initialize the models from synoptic reconnaissance flights will help reduce uncertainty.

The bottom line, 96L will move into the Gulf of Mexico and is then shrouded by the mists of uncertainty. I also think that it's a possibility (>50%) that it will become a tropical cyclone sometime in the next 48-72 hours (leaning towards sometime in day 2-3 based on the model runs.)


Fig. 3 Plot of maximum winds (mph) for the next 120 hours from the 18Z July 5 GFS model run.Parallel GFS version.


Fig. 4 Plot of maximum winds (mph) for the next 120 hours from the 18Z July 5 HWRF model run.


Fig. 5 Plot of maximum winds (mph) for the next 120 hours from the 12Z July 5 CMC global model run.NOGAPS wind swath.

Next update
I'll probably tweak this blog later tonight as new model runs come in. I'll have a full update tomorrow afternoon (Pacific time).

Categories: Hurricane
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 651 - 701

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43Blog Index

651. jamesrainier 6:54 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Member Since: June 1, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 111
653. Hardcoreweather2010 6:59 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Best looking INVEST of the 2010 storm season! We are not worthy 95L !!!!


Member Since: January 24, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 529
654. mtyweatherfan90 7:03 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting btwntx08:
also looks like monterrey mx is getting more rains that they dont need desperately flooding is already horrible there


Indeed is raining very hard and radar shows it might continue at least 5 more hours. Right now as of 2 am cdt I'm collecting water with a tray from rain and from the runoffs of the roof. 5 days without water, we desperately need water and outside is still raining!!!!

They're some rumours that two medium dams within northern Nuevo Leon have collapsed and also Sabinas river has crested and some friends living in Piedras Negras next to Del Rio it seems that the Rio Grande has crested there too. WATCH OUT LAREDO, McAllen and BROWNSVILLE!!!!!!
Member Since: July 9, 2008 Posts: 8 Comments: 334
658. Hardcoreweather2010 7:25 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Member Since: January 24, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 529
659. USSINS 7:35 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
While everything else is going north and east, the attached-to-the-front, odd convective mesoscale mass is back out over water and headed west.

Naaaah, nothing tropical and significant about this lil ol' thang! ;P


It's called a T R O P I C A L Depression!
660. mtyweatherfan90 7:36 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting btwntx08:

yea indeed there is a flood warning for the laredo as the river is forecasted to be at major flood stage


Were can I find the data about the levels of us rivers?
Member Since: July 9, 2008 Posts: 8 Comments: 334
661. Hardcoreweather2010 7:37 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Member Since: January 24, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 529
662. transitzone 7:47 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting mtyweatherfan90:


Were can I find the data about the levels of us rivers?


Here ya go
Member Since: March 22, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 55
664. mtyweatherfan90 7:49 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
thnks transitzone and btwntx08:)
i just took a shower from water collected from rain and used only 10 liters!! :) that has to be green!!! xD
Member Since: July 9, 2008 Posts: 8 Comments: 334
666. etringer 8:07 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Looks like 95L decided to hang around a little while! Wow!
Member Since: May 24, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 13
667. IKE 8:30 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting futuremet:
00z CMC shows nothing, zilch, nada, rien...


Talk about flip-flopping over 96L...lol.

The 00Z ECMWF doesn't do much w/96L at all.....or anything significant in the Atlantic....
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070
668. robert88 8:55 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
The EURO makes sense. Conditions in the Atlantic basin are looking like a typical July. The SAL and dry sinking air are keeping everything in check and shear is a little more widespread in the W Atlantic than it was in June. I don't expect another named storm until mid July or later.
Member Since: May 22, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 877
669. IKE 9:05 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting robert88:
The EURO makes sense. Conditions in the Atlantic basin are looking like a typical July. The SAL and dry sinking air are keeping everything in check and shear is a little more widespread in the W Atlantic than it was in June. I don't expect another named storm until mid July or later.



2005, part 2? Ain't happening, #'s wise. I wonder if these experts will lower their #'s on their next update?

13-7-4 was my pick a few months ago. Maybe I won't be that far off.

After 96L I don't see much in the Atlantic for the next 7-10 days.
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070
670. robert88 9:27 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting IKE:



2005, part 2? Ain't happening, #'s wise. I wonder if these experts will lower their #'s on their next update?

13-7-4 was my pick a few months ago. Maybe I won't be that far off.

After 96L I don't see much in the Atlantic for the next 7-10 days.



I think it is a good possibility they could lower just a little. I do think in August and September we could have storms form in the Caribbean and GOM comparable(intensity)to 2004 and 2005. The water temps are going to be slightly higher this year during the peak of the season than 2005 most likely. I do believe the #s will not be anything close to 2005 though. I do agree we will not see a named storm for another 7-10 days as well. The pattern right now shows something missing for sure. I don't think 96L is going to even get to TD status imo. We shall see.
Member Since: May 22, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 877
671. wfyweather 10:04 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
96L firing new convection.... I think a depression is somewhat likely to develop today. 95L decided to take its time llolll
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
672. wfyweather 10:08 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting IKE:



2005, part 2? Ain't happening, #'s wise. I wonder if these experts will lower their #'s on their next update?

13-7-4 was my pick a few months ago. Maybe I won't be that far off.

After 96L I don't see much in the Atlantic for the next 7-10 days.


I disagree completely. They will not be lowering there numbers. I think you will find that the beginning of the season has no effect on the end of the season at all...... just because the first half of the season may be a little on the quiet side.... doesnt mean late season will do the same. 2005 was a perfect example... also..... if we make it out of july with even just 3 named storms... that puts us only a few storms behind 2005... plus... in 2005 most forecasts called for only 12 to 14 named storms.... seasons are very unpredictible... im going in 17-12-5
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
673. IKE 10:15 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
6Z NOGAPS is weaker with the vorticity of 96L. CMC dropped it. ECMWF keeps it as a wave. UKMET 00Z keeps it as a wave. GFS operational doesn't develop it...keeps it as a wave. GFS parallel has a 1007 mb low just off of the NE coast of Mexico at 54 hours.

GFDL and HWRF aren't strong with 96L either. Not much model support on 96L. Looks like a rainmaker for the Texas and possibly Louisiana coast and Mexican coast.
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070
674. IKE 10:18 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting wfyweather:


I disagree completely. They will not be lowering there numbers. I think you will find that the beginning of the season has no effect on the end of the season at all...... just because the first half of the season may be a little on the quiet side.... doesnt mean late season will do the same. 2005 was a perfect example... also..... if we make it out of july with even just 3 named storms... that puts us only a few storms behind 2005... plus... in 2005 most forecasts called for only 12 to 14 named storms.... seasons are very unpredictible... im going in 17-12-5



2005 had 7 by the end of July and 9, total, by August 4th.
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070
675. wfyweather 10:21 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting IKE:



2005 had 7 by the end of July and 9, total, by August 4th.


so you agree... because if we made it out of july with 3 that puts us at 4 which is only a few behind 7
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
676. IKE 10:25 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting wfyweather:


so you agree... because if we made it out of july with 3 that puts us at 4 which is only a few behind 7


That's over twice as many. Average that out over a full 6 months. I think 2010 will be above average, just not as much as some thought and not another 2005.
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070
677. wfyweather 10:31 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting IKE:


That's over twice as many. Average that out over a full 6 months. I think 2010 will be above average, just not as much as some thought and not another 2005.


If u think 7 is over twice as many as 4.... you need to go back to school
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
679. wfyweather 10:34 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting StormW:
Good morning!


Morning, Storm!
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
680. robert88 10:35 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
96L looks like an open wave with a little more convection this morning. It is nothing to raise your eyebrows at. 96L never formed a LLC and it only obtained a MLC for a short period of time. It has been mostly a mess it's whole journey. It has lost a lot of model support including the ECMWF. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the NHC drops it's chances again later on today.
Member Since: May 22, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 877
681. IKE 10:35 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting wfyweather:


If u think 7 is over twice as many as 4.... you need to go back to school


I thought you meant 3 total(June and July) and not just 3 in July.

Think what you want...maybe you'll be correct and I'll eat crow.
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070
682. Hhunter 10:35 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
for diurnal minnemum i like the looks of the core of 96L today could be the day
Member Since: August 19, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2886
683. wfyweather 10:38 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting IKE:


I thought you meant 3 total(June and July) and not just 3 in July.

Think what you want...maybe you'll be correct and I'll eat crow.


yum
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
684. Hhunter 10:39 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Member Since: August 19, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2886
685. wfyweather 10:40 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting Hhunter:


i See the llc just east of the tip of the yucatan
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
686. Hhunter 10:40 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Member Since: August 19, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2886
687. IKE 10:42 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
SYNOPSIS FOR THE GULF OF MEXICO
430 AM CDT TUE JUL 06 2010

.SYNOPSIS...A 1006 MB LOW NEAR 29.5N92W AT 0600 UTC IS CURRENTLY
MOVING ONTO THE LOUISIANA COAST AND WILL DISSIPATE TODAY. BROAD
LOW PRES...POSSIBLY A TROPICAL CYCLONE...WILL DEVELOP TODAY
ALONG THE TROPICAL WAVE CURRENTLY ALONG 87W S OF 26N. THE LOW
WILL BE NEAR 23N90W EARLY WED...27N94W EARLY THU...AND THEN IS
EXPECTED TO MOVE INLAND NE TEXAS THU NIGHT. HIGH PRES WILL BUILD
FROM THE E ALONG 28N THU THROUGH SAT.



SYNOPSIS FOR CARIBBEAN SEA AND TROPICAL N ATLC FROM 07N TO 22N
BETWEEN 55W AND 65W
530 AM EDT TUE JUL 06 2010

.SYNOPSIS...A TROPICAL WAVE LIES OVER THE EASTERN YUCATAN
PENINSULA AND WILL SLOWLY MOVE W AWAY FROM THE AREA. A SECOND
TROPICAL WAVE IS ALONG 68W AND WILL MOVE ACROSS THE CENTRAL
CARIBBEAN TODAY AND THROUGH THE WESTERN CARIBBEAN WED AND THU. A
THIRD TROPICAL WAVE ALONG 51W S OF 13N IS EXPECTED TO ARRIVE
INTO THE TROPICAL N ATLC TODAY AND FOLLOW THE FIST WAVE THROUGH
THE CARIBBEAN THROUGH FRI. A FOURTH TROPICAL WAVE WELL E OF THE
AREA WILL MOVE INTO THE TROPICAL N ATLC WATERS BY FRI AND THE E
CARIBBEAN SAT.



Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070
688. Hhunter 10:43 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
i do believe 96L getting more line up
Member Since: August 19, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2886
689. Hhunter 10:44 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Member Since: August 19, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2886
690. Hhunter 10:45 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Member Since: August 19, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2886
691. Hhunter 10:48 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
for diurnal minnimum i am favorably impressed with 96L core east of yucatan. opinions for next 10 minutes then its shower and work
Member Since: August 19, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2886
692. leo305 10:49 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
looks like the core of 96L, if there is one, has moved inland..
Member Since: April 17, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 1752
693. MahFL 10:52 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
The first month of the season has been busier than normal, we had a Hurricane remember. Also typically how many named storms occur in July ?
Member Since: June 9, 2004 Posts: 0 Comments: 2467
694. Hhunter 10:53 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
believe core of 96L is right on th ne tip of yucatan
Member Since: August 19, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2886
695. wfyweather 10:54 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting MahFL:
The first month of the season has been busier than normal, we had a Hurricane remember. Also typically how many named storms occur in July ?


the average for june is 1 storm every other year and for july i think its 1 a year
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
696. Hhunter 10:57 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
well folks keep the debate going
Member Since: August 19, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2886
697. MahFL 10:57 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Leo305, I disagree.
Member Since: June 9, 2004 Posts: 0 Comments: 2467
698. IKE 10:58 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
After looking at the 1015 satellite on 96L..I think the center, if you can call it that, is over the NE Yucatan.

6 GMT coordinates were 19.6N and 86.1W...that was a few hours ago...5, I think.
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070
699. sporteguy03 11:00 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Quoting IKE:


I thought you meant 3 total(June and July) and not just 3 in July.

Think what you want...maybe you'll be correct and I'll eat crow.


Hope your right Ike, otherwise alot of reliable agencies would be wrong, I think only one group had below average WRC (Weather Research Center) maybe they will be right, but 8 systems?

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2325344420100623
Member Since: July 7, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 4840
700. WxLogic 11:02 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Morning...
Member Since: August 14, 2008 Posts: 4 Comments: 4721
701. IKE 11:02 AM GMT on July 06, 2010    
Center is real close to Cozumel, Mexico...their coordinates....20.5N and 86.9W....

Current weather....

Cozumel, MX (Airport)
Updated: 16 min 34 sec ago
Overcast
73 °F
Overcast
Humidity: 100%
Dew Point: 73 °F
Wind: Calm
Pressure: 29.75 in (Steady)
Visibility: 5.0 miles
UV: 0 out of 16
Clouds:
Mostly Cloudy 1200 ft
Overcast 8000 ft
(Above Ground Level)
Elevation: 16 ft
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070

Viewing: 651 - 701

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity