Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Tropical Storm Paula forming
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 7:30 PM GMT on October 11, 2010 +2
Data from the Hurricane Hunters, land stations, and satellite imagery reveal that the strong tropical disturbance centered near the coast of Honduras just west of the border with Nicaragua is now Tropical Storm Paula. Paula is the 16th named storm of the 2010 Atlantic hurricane season. The Hurricane Hunters reported a central pressure of 1001 mb and top surface winds of 45 mph in their 2:11pm EDT center fix. Satellite imagery shows a well-organized system with a modest but increasing amount of intense thunderstorm activity, and some respectable low-level spiral bands. Water vapor satellite loops reveal that Paula has been able to substantially moisten the atmosphere in the Western Caribbean over the past day, and dry air will be less of an impediment to development than it was yesterday. Wind shear is a moderate 10 - 15 knots. Puerto Lempira, Honduras reported sustained winds of 35 mph at 12pm CST this afternoon, with 3.31" of rain from the storm thus far.


Figure 1. Afternoon satellite image of Paula.

Forecast for Paula
Proximity to land is hampering Paula's ability to intensify some, and the storm's northwest movement of 10 mph will take the center far enough away from the coast of Honduras this evening to substantially increase the storm's ability to intensify. The latest SHIPS model forecast calls for wind shear to stay mostly in the moderate range, 10 - 15 knots, through Tuesday afternoon, then increase to the high range, 20 - 25 knots, for the remainder of the week. The computer models predict Paula will continue on a northwest motion then turn more north-northwest on Wednesday, which would take the storm close to landfall on the coast of Belize or Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula Tuesday night or Wednesday morning. At that time, Paula may be approaching Category 2 hurricane status, due to the moderate wind shear, SSTs of 29°C, and a sufficiently moist atmosphere. On Wednesday, there is considerable doubt about the future path of Paula. Steering currents in the Western Caribbean will collapse, potentially allowing Paula to wander in the region for many days, as predicted by the GFS and HWRF models. It is also possible that Paula will push far enough inland over Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula that the storm will dissipate, as predicted by the NOGAPS model. Finally, if Paula grows strong quickly, and pushes far enough north, it could get caught up a strong trough of low pressure predicted to traverse the U.S. this week (and spawn a Nor'easter for New England this weekend.) In this scenario, offered by the GFDL model, Paula would make a sharp turn to the east-northeast, hit western Cuba, bring tropical storm-force finds to the Florida Keys on Thursday, then move into the Bahama Islands by Friday or Saturday. It is too early to say which of these scenarios is the most likely, as the storm is just forming and the models do not have a good handle on it yet. Regardless, northern Honduras, Belize, and Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula will receive dangerous flooding rains from Paula today through Wednesday.

The U.S. drought in major hurricanes
On average, the U.S. gets hit by one major Category 3 or stronger hurricane every two years. This year, the team of hurricane forecasters at Colorado State University called for a 76% chance of a major hurricane hitting the U.S. in their June forecast. However, the odds of a major hurricane hitting the U.S. are rapidly dwindling. Over the past fifty years, the only Category 3 or stronger hurricanes to hit the U.S. after October 1 were Hilda (October 3, 1964), Opal (October 4, 1995), and Wilma (October 24, 2005). Hilda and Opal were already named tropical storms as of October 1, so Wilma was the major hurricane that formed after October 1 to hit the U.S. during this period. Although we still need to keep a wary eye on developments in the Western Caribbean over the next few weeks, the odds are that 2010 will join 1951 as the only year to have five or more major hurricanes in the Atlantic, but no landfalling major hurricane in the U.S. (1958 is also listed as such a year, but a re-analysis effort is showing that Hurricane Helene hit North Carolina as a major hurricane that year.) If 2010 finishes without a major hurricane hitting the U.S., this will mark the first such five-year stretch since 1910 - 1914.


Figure 2. Hurricane Wilma over South Florida as a Category 3 hurricane on October 24, 2005. Wilma was the last major hurricane to hit the U.S.

However, some caveats are required. Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, which both made landfall in the U.S. in 2008 as top-end Category 2 storms with 110 mph winds, would probably have been classified as Category 3 hurricanes had they occurred early in the 20th century. This is because in past, when there were not any reliable wind measurements in the vicinity of a landfalling hurricane (a common occurrence), the storm was classified based on its central pressure. Gustav and Ike had central pressures of 957 and 952 mb, respectively, which would have qualified them as Category 3 storms. Similarly, Hurricane Floyd of 1999 and Hurricane Isabel of 2002 (though not within the last five years) were strong Category 2 hurricanes with 105 mph winds at landfall, but had central pressures of 956 mb. These hurricanes would also have been classified as Category 3 hurricanes in the past. There are many storms from the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s that will likely change their landfall classification once re-analysis efforts are completed over the next few years. One case is Hurricane Ten of 1949, which is listed as having winds of a low-end Category 4 hurricane (135 mph) just before landfall, which would make it the only October major hurricane to make landfall in Texas. However, the hurricane is only given a Category 2 strength at landfall, based on its central pressure.

Prior to 1960, there were five major hurricanes that hit Florida in October. Most notable of these is Hurricane King, which hit downtown Miami on October 18, 1950, as a Category 3 hurricane.

Record quiet hurricane and typhoon seasons in the Pacific
Over in the Western Pacific, it is currently the quietest typhoon season on record, according to statistics computed by forecaster Paul Stanko at the NWS office on Guam. On average, by this point in the season, there should have been 21 named storms, 13 typhoons, and 3 supertyphoons (storms with 150+ mph winds.) So far in 2010, there have been just 12 named storms, 6 typhoons, and no supertyphoons. The record lows for the Western Pacific (since 1951) are 18 named storms, 9 typhoons, and 0 supertyphoons. We have a good chance of beating or tying all of those records. Over the in the Eastern Pacific, it has also been a near record-quiet season. On average, the Eastern Pacific has 15 named storms, 8 hurricanes, and 3 intense hurricanes in a season. So far in 2010, there have been 7 named storms, 3 hurricanes, and 2 intense hurricanes. The record quietest season since 1966 was the year 1977, when the Eastern Pacific had 8 named storms, 4 hurricanes, and 0 intense hurricanes. Climatology suggests that on average, we can expect just one more named storm in the Eastern Pacific this late in the season, so there is a good chance that the 2010 season is over. La Niña is largely responsible to the quiet Eastern Pacific hurricane season, due in part to the cool sea surface temperatures it brought. La Niña also commonly causes less active Western Pacific typhoon seasons, since the warmest waters there shift closer to Asia, reducing the amount of time storms have over water.

I'll have an update Tuesday morning at the latest.

Jeff Masters
Categories: Hurricane
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 51 - 101

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29Blog Index

51. NOLALawyer 7:52 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
I think Paula is the last decent storm this season will spawn. It will probably just go inland and die in Mexico. That would be par for this season's course.
Member Since: September 3, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 517
52. BahaHurican 7:52 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Thanks, CRS.... have to remember 2 check the marine forecast now and again... likely to have useful facts for us island types...
Member Since: October 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17682
53. Seastep 7:52 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting Stormchaser2007:
Had to come out of lurking for this...

D. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind: 69kts (~ 79.4mph)

Highly doubt its reliable, but if it is things will be interesting.


Agree, but they usually discount outside the vortex message. Have never seen NHC discount a vortex message wind, but there's always a first for everything.

Seems out-of-kilter, to me.
Member Since: September 9, 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 3406
54. Stormchaser2007 7:52 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Lightning near the center. Common with deepening systems.

Paula may become more interesting than I thought.

"SPIRAL BAND BETTER ORGANIZED NW AROUND TO NE
INFREQ LTG IN NW QUAD WITH BAND"
Member Since: June 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15248
55. StormChaser81 7:53 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
-_-
Member Since: August 11, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 2315
56. hydrus 7:54 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Looks impressive from up here..
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14314
57. Tazmanian 7:55 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting StormChaser81:
You can see the yellow wind flag in this image. Right under the green ones.




but how right is that map?
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5088 Comments: 111360
58. hydrus 7:56 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Here,s a pic showing the trough over the U.S...
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14314
59. MiamiHurricanes09 7:56 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
53. Seastep 3:52 PM EDT on October 11, 2010

Could you imagine that? From invest to hurricane? That would be a big boo-boo by the NHC.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
60. CyclonicVoyage 7:56 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
From the Dr. Masters above

Finally, if Paula grows strong quickly, and pushes far enough north, it could get caught up a strong trough of low pressure predicted to traverse the U.S. this week (and spawn a Nor'easter for New England this weekend.)
Member Since: January 30, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 3259
61. Stormchaser2007 7:57 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    

Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
53. Seastep 3:52 PM EDT on October 11, 2010

Could you imagine that? From invest to hurricane? That would be a big boo-boo by the NHC.
Would be amazing and extremely interesting to see.

Guess we'll have to wait for another pass.

Member Since: June 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15248
62. CyclonicVoyage 7:57 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
53. Seastep 3:52 PM EDT on October 11, 2010

Could you imagine that? From invest to hurricane? That would be a big boo-boo by the NHC.


I can't speak for others but, I know there are a few, who think this has been a tropical cyclone for some time now.
Member Since: January 30, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 3259
63. Tazmanian 7:58 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
any way too tell if we have a eye wall forming yet?
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5088 Comments: 111360
64. Stormchaser2007 7:59 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Good amount of lightning in 98L


Member Since: June 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15248
65. MiamiHurricanes09 7:59 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Cloud tops as cold as -80C firing atop Paula's circulation. We are definitely dealing with an intensifying system.

Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
67. Seastep 8:00 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
59. MiamiHurricanes09

Yeah, 09, but I doubt it. Maybe rookies in the HH, LOL.

But, you never know. If the center is over land very much farther than they have been issuing the vorts, the pressure would definitely be sub-1000.

Still think they'll discount that wind from the vortex message for the first time that I can recall.
Member Since: September 9, 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 3406
68. Max1023 8:00 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
I think that the 77 knot FL winds were caused by an embedded mesoscale votex or maybe a powerful microburst, not representative of the whole storm.
Member Since: July 22, 2008 Posts: 1 Comments: 286
69. MiamiHurricanes09 8:00 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting CyclonicVoyage:


I can't speak for others but, I know there are a few, who think this has been a tropical cyclone for some time now.
I'm pretty sure this has been a tropical cyclone since the morning...don't know what the NHC's waiting for.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
70. Tazmanian 8:01 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
Cloud tops as cold as -80C firing atop Paula's circulation. We are definitely dealing with an intensifying system.




09 is there any way too tell if we got a eye wall forming yet?
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5088 Comments: 111360
71. scott39 8:01 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Why hasnt the NHC put Paula on thier page yet???
Member Since: June 13, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 6207
72. hydrus 8:01 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting hurristat:


Is the Franklin Eddy that helped to contain the oil spill still active?
I am not sure which one it is, but here is the past 30 days...
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14314
73. Seastep 8:01 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Good to see you Dewey.
Member Since: September 9, 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 3406
74. MiamiHurricanes09 8:02 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting Tazmanian:
any way too tell if we have a eye wall forming yet?
No eye wall, but they're hints of one developing.

Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
75. Seastep 8:02 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting scott39:
Why hasnt the NHC put Paula on thier page yet???


Most likely, in prepping everything, there really isn't much sense in issuing a special advisory and then issuing another a half hour to hour later.
Member Since: September 9, 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 3406
77. Ameister12 8:02 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Wow! A lot happened with 98L, (or should I say Paula) while I was in school. I'm still thinking it could become a hurricane, probably a brief one, before running into a hostel environment.
Member Since: August 9, 2009 Posts: 9 Comments: 3518
78. CyclonicVoyage 8:02 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Solid NW movement.

Member Since: January 30, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 3259
79. BobinTampa 8:03 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting Seastep:
Good to see you Dewey.


out of the pokey?
Member Since: August 14, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 508
80. Tazmanian 8:03 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
No eye wall, but they're hints of one developing.




wow this is nuts its geting vary strong vary fast
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5088 Comments: 111360
81. bwi 8:03 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
These are flight level winds -- 30-second average at about 1,200 feet above sea level -- with the time and location stamps from the HH:

19:27:00Z 15.900N 83.733W 372 meters (~ 1,220 feet) 1001.0 mb (~ 29.56 inHg) - From 181%uFFFD at 58 knots(From the S at ~ 66.7 mph)
19:27:30Z 15.917N 83.700W 378 meters (~ 1,240 feet) 1001.9 mb (~ 29.59 inHg) - From 181%uFFFD at 69 knots(From the S at ~ 79.3 mph)
19:28:00Z 15.950N 83.683W 387 meters (~ 1,270 feet) 1003.2 mb(~ 29.62 inHg) - From 181%uFFFD at 72 knots(From the S at ~ 82.8 mph)
19:28:30Z 15.967N 83.667W 396 meters (~ 1,299 feet) 1004.2 mb(~ 29.65 inHg) - From 180%uFFFD at 61 knots(From the S at ~ 70.1 mph)
Member Since: September 4, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 1134
82. CybrTeddy 8:03 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Alright, here we go once again. TS Paula.
Crow me, I thought 98L wouldn't spin up.



Paula is a well organized TS, atleast 45 mph IMO. Pressure 1000 mb, Recon supports that.

Paula's formation marks the 3rd earliest 'P' name behind Pablo in 1995 and Phillipe in 2005.
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 253 Comments: 20278
83. Stormchaser2007 8:03 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    

Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
I'm pretty sure this has been a tropical cyclone since the morning...don't know what the NHC's waiting for.
I think the reason they're waiting is they want to have all their facts staright. Probably wouldn't want to call this a 45mph tropical storm when it's actually a good deal stronger.


Member Since: June 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15248
84. scott39 8:03 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting Seastep:


Most likely, in prepping everything, there really isn't much sense in issuing a special advisory and then issuing another a half hour to hour later.
I didnt think other weather sites could label 98L--Paula until the NHC did??
Member Since: June 13, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 6207
85. JLPR2 8:04 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
I'm pretty sure this has been a tropical cyclone since the morning...don't know what the NHC's waiting for.


Exactly! >:\
What's up with the NHC!
Member Since: September 4, 2007 Posts: 7 Comments: 7487
86. MiamiHurricanes09 8:04 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting Seastep:
59. MiamiHurricanes09

Yeah, 09, but I doubt it. Maybe rookies in the HH, LOL.

But, you never know. If the center is over land very much farther than they have been issuing the vorts, the pressure would definitely be sub-1000.

Still think they'll discount that wind from the vortex message for the first time that I can recall.
LOL. The center does appear to be over water. Notice when they were passing over the circulation how the wind barbs did a cyclonic rotation.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
87. hydrus 8:04 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting Tazmanian:



09 is there any way too tell if we got a eye wall forming yet?
I can sometimes see the early stages of eyewall formation with Funktop...
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14314
88. CyclonicVoyage 8:04 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
I'm pretty sure this has been a tropical cyclone since the morning...don't know what the NHC's waiting for.


They just seem different this year.
Member Since: January 30, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 3259
89. cyclonekid 8:04 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Paula

AL, 18, 2010101118, , BEST, 0, 157N, 837W, 40, 1001, TS
Member Since: July 14, 2009 Posts: 51 Comments: 1629
90. Seastep 8:05 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
82. CybrTeddy

LOL, consider it done.

NHC is just waiting so as to crow my 48hrs from about 2:30pm on Saturday.

I just know that is the reason. ;)
Member Since: September 9, 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 3406
91. hurricane47 8:05 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
The NHC really knows what they are doing. You can be wrong and it amounts to nothing. If they are wrong it carries weight.
Member Since: June 25, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 16
92. Stormchaser2007 8:05 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting cyclonekid:
Paula

AL, 18, 2010101118, , BEST, 0, 157N, 837W, 40, 1001, TS
That's been up for a few hours.
Member Since: June 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15248
93. MiamiHurricanes09 8:05 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting Stormchaser2007:

I think the reason they're waiting is they want to have all their facts staright. Probably wouldn't want to call this a 45mph tropical storm when it's actually a good deal stronger.


That's true. You don't want to have a speedy delivery on the advisory and then put out garbage that would have to be replaced with a special advisory shortly thereafter.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
94. JLPR2 8:06 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
I bet that if 98L were scrapping Florida and not CA the NHC would be getting hate mail, LOL!
Member Since: September 4, 2007 Posts: 7 Comments: 7487
95. Seastep 8:06 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting scott39:
I didnt think other weather sites could label 98L--Paula until the NHC did??


Doc did. And, I assure you it has been TS Paula to NHC for a couple hours now....
Member Since: September 9, 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 3406
97. Tazmanian 8:06 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
i say where looking at 60 too 70mph TS at 5pm
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5088 Comments: 111360
98. scott39 8:06 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Who thinks Paula is stronger than 45mph?
Member Since: June 13, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 6207
99. Tazmanian 8:07 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting JLPR2:
I bet that if 98L were scrapping Florida and not CA the NHC would be getting hate mail, LOL!




LOL
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5088 Comments: 111360
100. cyclonekid 8:07 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting Stormchaser2007:
That's been up for a few hours.
Sorry man...just got home from school.
Member Since: July 14, 2009 Posts: 51 Comments: 1629
101. Tazmanian 8:07 PM GMT on October 11, 2010    
Quoting scott39:
Who thinks Paula is stronger than 45mph?




me am going with 60 too 70 mph at 5pm
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5088 Comments: 111360

Viewing: 51 - 101

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity