Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

A cool and snowy winter for the U.S.; severe weather hits Louisiana
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 2:45 PM GMT on March 09, 2011 +2
The winter of 2010 - 2011 is in the history books, and ranks as the 39th coldest winter for the U.S. in the 116-year historical record, according to statistics released this week by the National Climatic Data Center. The cooler-than-average weather was primarily due to Arctic air spilling southwards over the eastern 2/3 of the nation due to an unusually weak Arctic Oscillation. This natural pattern in the atmosphere (whose North Atlantic version is called the North Atlantic Oscillation) allows cold air to spill southwards over the Eastern U.S., Western Europe, and East Asia when low pressure over the Arctic weakens, and high pressure over the North Atlantic also weakens. The state most affected by this unusual winter pattern was Florida, which recorded its 10th coldest winter. No other states had a top-ten coldest or warmest winter.


Figure 1. The winter of 2010 - 2011 featured colder than average temperatures over many states in the eastern 2/3 of the country, with Florida suffering its 10th coldest winter in the 116-year record. Image credit: National Climatic Data Center.

Wet in the Upper Midwest, dry in the South
The winter of 2010 - 2011 featured very heavy precipitation over the Upper Midwest, with South Dakota and Montana recording top-ten wettest winters. The South and mid-Atlantic were very dry, with eight states experiencing top-ten driest winters. This pattern is a typical one for a La Niña winter, since the cooler than average waters off the Pacific coast of South America act to deflect the jet stream so that the preferred track for winter storms takes them to the north over the Upper Midwest. However, the Ohio Valley typically gets above average precipitation during a La Niña winter, and that did not happen this year. This is fortunate, since very heavy rains the past two weeks have inundated Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, and Illinois, leading to moderate flooding on many rivers.


Figure 2. The winter of 2010 - 2011 featured very heavy precipitation over the Upper Midwest, with South Dakota and Montana recording top-ten wettest winters. Image credit: National Climatic Data Center.

A snowy winter for the U.S.
It was a very snowy winter for the contiguous U.S., with December, January, and February having the 7th, 5th, and 9th greatest snow extents in the 45-year record, respectively, according to the Rutgers Snow Lab. This is the 2nd consecutive very snowy winter in the U.S.; during the winter of 2009 - 2010, December, January, and February had the 1st, 7th, and 3rd greatest snow extents on record. However, an unusually early onset of spring over North America in 2010 led to April and May 2010 having the 4th lowest and 1st lowest snow extents on record for the U.S., and the snow extent numbers for North America were near average for the calendar year 2010 (Figure 3.)


Figure 3. Twelve-month running anomalies of monthly snow cover extent over Northern Hemisphere lands (including Greenland) as a whole and Eurasia and North America separately between November 1966 and December 2010. Anomalies are calculated from NOAA snow maps. Mean hemispheric snow extent is 25.0 million sq. km. for the full period of record. Monthly means for the period of record are used for 9 missing months between 1968 and 1971 in order to create a continuous series of running means. Missing months fall between June and October, no winter months are missing. Image credit: Rutgers Snow Lab.

Flooding concerns continue in the Upper Midwest
The heavy winter precipitation that hit the Upper Midwest primarily fell as snow, and recent snow water equivalent charts show that a wide swath of North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, and Wisconsin have the equivalent of 4 - 6 inches of rain locked into their snowpack. If a sudden spring thaw with heavy rain occurs later this month or in early April, record or near-record flooding is likely. The latest long-range forecasts from the G FS model do not show such an event is likely to occur over the next two weeks, though. A continuation of winter-like weather over the region with below-average temperatures and light snow is expected during the coming week, with a several-day period of thawing the week of March 20. Significant melting the massive snowpack will not begin to occur until the week of March 20, at the earliest.

Tornadoes, severe thunderstorms hit the South
A strong cold front pushing across the nation's southern states has brought severe thunderstorms, and tornado warnings have been issued for Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama this morning. A tornado touched down in Bush, LA at 5:20am CDT today, injuring one person and destroying one trailer. High winds from a thunderstorm hit Slidell, LA, causing roof damage, downed trees, and power outages in the city. NOAA's Storm Prediction Center has placed the region in its "Slight Risk" region for potential severe weather. You can track the action today on our severe weather page.

Jeff Masters
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 101 - 151

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10Blog Index

101. cchsweatherman 6:32 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Drakoen:
The last 00z run of the NAM did an excellent job in depicting the line strong/severe thunderstorms moving through the Southeast.

NAM 00z 18hr forecast:


Southeast Weather Radar:


Thats a pretty remarkable comparison. The NAM usually does a good job with systems like these, but this is pretty impressive.
Member Since: April 14, 2007 Posts: 8 Comments: 4928
102. Drakoen 6:34 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting jeffs713:


Looks like NAM's crystal ball was working today. (actually, the NAM has been very solid for local forecasts here in the Houston area all winter)


The NAM is a great model to use out to 48 hours ago. It can accurately depict the mesoscale features, given the models high-resolution, that global models cannot pick up on.
Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29012
104. jeffs713 6:39 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Drakoen:


The NAM is a great model to use out to 48 hours ago. It can accurately depict the mesoscale features, given the models high-resolution, that global models cannot pick up on.
Yep. I've noticed that it tends to have problems during the summer here (at least, it did last year), but the rest of the year, it is pretty solid.

Then again, during the summer, there isn't much in the way of forcing to touch off a storm. Storms during the summer touch off near-randomly, without much in the way of a causative agent (aside from the fact that the sun is shining, and it is a day that ends in "y"). Yeah, we get shortwaves through here pretty consistently, but there is almost always a 20% POP.
Member Since: August 3, 2008 Posts: 15 Comments: 5729
106. RTLSNK (Mod) 6:40 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Eastern edge of the system coming into Macon at this time.
Just mild thunderstorm conditions up here.
Looks like the real energy is coming through the panhandle.

Member Since: September 3, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 15735
108. jeffs713 6:42 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Cochise000:


What was wrong with solid rocket boosters? Much, much cheaper, and look at the loss of life (human) incurred with the shuttle program.

Solid boosters are great, as long as the o-rings are maintained (which they are now). The issue is, and always has been, the crew & cargo module. We have oodles of technology to get a vehicle into orbit. Just what vehicle?
Member Since: August 3, 2008 Posts: 15 Comments: 5729
109. PcolaDan 6:47 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting RTLSNK:
Eastern edge of the system coming into Macon at this time.
Just mild thunderstorm conditions up here.
Looks like the real energy is coming through the panhandle.



Besides the tornadoes, we have been having over 5000 lightning strike per half hour. Better than a defibrillator for kick starting the heart. :)
Member Since: August 22, 2008 Posts: 12 Comments: 6008
110. Drakoen 6:48 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
I highly recommend bookmarking this site for NAM. It contains plethora of graphics for the NAM that are aesthetically nice to look at and very detailed as well. For example this image from the WRF-NMM:

Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29012
113. flsky 7:04 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Surfcropper:
ALERT:

SEVERELY GOOD WEATHER UPDATE


77.8 °F

Feels Like 80 °F

Mostly Sunny

10% chance of showers

Too bad we don't know where this is....
Member Since: October 24, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 1293
114. atmoaggie 7:05 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Umm, I knew there was wind to be had, but wow, it takes a lot to break a substantial oak. Those usually uproot, rather than snap. (At least around here, they do).



On second look, maybe it's a maple.

Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
119. Jedkins01 7:14 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting atmoaggie:
Still debating this in mine own head...



According to a NWS person on WWL radio (didn't catch whom, exactly), ~5 inches fell in ~30 minutes on the southshore, causing significant street flooding.

If the ob site recorded/reported at the right interval, maybe it did actually measure that. It sure was a damned hard rain, but...


My gosh, that is incredible!

Dang! It is possible, but its hard to imagine rain that heavy is possible without having PW's above 2.00 inches
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5420
120. atmoaggie 7:14 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting cat5hurricane:

It's not a White, perhaps a Cherrybark Aak or Southern Red? Nonetheless, an oak is an oak. Wow.
I can't say it isn't a maple. Most of those have yet to start sprouting their leaves. Most any oak in that area is going to be a live oak...evergreen.

And a familiar scene from NOLA (in one of the lowest spots):


The rain was simply more (and fell so quickly) than the pumps could move. They've caught up already, I expect. (This happens every few years, at best.)

No one's pumping system can handle ~5 inches in 30 minutes.
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
121. atmoaggie 7:15 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting cat5hurricane:
@ 114:

A Maple is no joke either. One of the strongest hardwoods as well.
Our red maples do tend to snap under duress. Much more easily than the live oaks.
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
122. stillwaiting 7:16 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
heard the double sonic boom on siesta key here in sarasota,loooud!!!!,im going to upload a video to you tube,i was able to record the boom(couldnt see the shuttle even though it was clear out???)
Member Since: October 5, 2007 Posts: 20 Comments: 4970
123. atmoaggie 7:17 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Jedkins01:


My gosh, that is incredible!

Dang! It is possible, but its hard to imagine rain that heavy is possible without having PW's above 2.00 inches
Almost 9 inches per hour rainfall rate...

I thought it a bit astounding and unbelievable at first. Not so sure it isn't possibly correct, now, tho.
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
124. Jedkins01 7:17 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting atmoaggie:
Umm, I knew there was wind to be had, but wow, it takes a lot to break a substantial oak. Those usually uproot, rather than snap. (At least around here, they do).



On second look, maybe it's a maple.



Was this by your place? Dang, sounds like you had some nasty down bursts, unfortunately for me, not expecting weather that exciting with the cold front here in Central Florida. There will be plenty of moisture in place, but that's about it, the upper disturbance and its energy will be long gone by he time it arrives.
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5420
125. Patrap 7:17 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Two witnesses recount Slidell tornado

Posted on Wednesday, March 9, 2011 11:29AM

Amanda Trosclair and Marcia Jorgenson tell what they heard and saw of a tornado that touched town in Slidell Wednesday, March 9, 2011.


Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 377 Comments: 112968
126. atmoaggie 7:18 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Surfcropper:


That a Ford or a Chevy?
Umm, definitely a Chevy. Why?
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
127. atmoaggie 7:19 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Jedkins01:


Was this by your place? Dang, sounds like you had some nasty down bursts, unfortunately for me, not expecting weather that exciting with the cold front here in Central Florida. There will be plenty of moisture in place, but that's about it, the upper disturbance and its energy will be long gone by he time it arrives.
That's ~15 miles from home. 4 miles from work.

Was a small nado. See Pat's Vid. (same event)
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
128. Patrap 7:19 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Buy a NOAA Weather Alert Radio or 2 and give one to a Neighbor or Friend.

Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 377 Comments: 112968
129. Skyepony (Mod) 7:20 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Surfcropper:


A smaller craft with substantial payload capabilities that could be carried by a 747-100 then release it and engage rocket boosters would be efficient..

Is that possible?


That's like X-33 & 34. They went to launching them off Atlas. A X-37B went up the other day. Smaller craft costs the crew space but it's got a decent payload.

The SpaceX Dragon test, I think end of last year, went really good. It carries people & crew & launches off a Falcon9.

Tough to see Discovery end, still a little peeved about Orion (which that new European ship reminds me alot of) but there is other vehicles that have recently been tested.. X-37B is on it's second mission that I know of right now.
Member Since: August 10, 2005 Posts: 145 Comments: 29957
132. CybrTeddy 7:21 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Welcome home Discovery..
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 255 Comments: 20632
133. atmoaggie 7:22 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Surfcropper:


Cause it ain't no Dodge
*groan*
;-)
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
134. Neapolitan 7:23 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Surfcropper:


A smaller craft with substantial payload capabilities that could be carried by a 747-100 then release it and engage rocket boosters would be efficient..

Is that possible?

Better than nothing...but a 747 can only carry a payload 5% or so of the way to orbiting altitude, and to less than 4% of orbital velocity

I'm sad to see the shuttle program go; my father worked on it after he and thousands of others were shifted over from the Apollo program, so there's a tinge of sentimentality to me. But private enterprise has proven that it'll be able to do it cheaper and safer, so I'm all for it. (I can name a dozen acquaintances right now who've fled NASA or one of its subs for work in the private space sector, and they all seem happy and excited about the future.) To me, NASA did the Charles Lindbergh thing by exploring new territory; now the Virgin Galactic and SpaceX folks need to take the reins, much as Pan Am and Braniff took over workaday aviation.

The good news for NASA, of course, is that the private sector won't be getting into the deep-space stuff; that will need to remain a government (multi-government) deal for the time being...
Member Since: November 8, 2009 Posts: 4 Comments: 11302
135. Jedkins01 7:23 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting atmoaggie:
Our red maples do tend to snap under duress. Much more easily than the live oaks.


yeah, maples are not nearly as strong as oaks in Florida. Most trees in Florida are way more durable then they are up north. I remember spending part of the summer up in Michigan with my relatives, what was just an average thunderstorm on a a cold front too me, apparently isn't for trees up there. 40 mph gusts or something around that did more damage in the Detroit suburb to trees and power lines than 75 mph does to trees and power lines here in North Pinellas County. It takes more than 70 mph do any real damage to trees and power lines here.


Now if only the same could be said for housing here lol
My house is built with strong building codes, but all the older homes are built terrible.

Part of the reason bats are breaking so much in the MLB is because of them being made with Maple, you would not see the same results with oak wood from Florida(the live oak I believe).

Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5420
136. Neapolitan 7:25 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting stillwaiting:
heard the double sonic boom on siesta key here in sarasota,loooud!!!!,im going to upload a video to you tube,i was able to record the boom(couldnt see the shuttle even though it was clear out???)

I've been able to see it from Naples if it came overheard at the right time (early or late); if the sun was high in the sky, it was impossible for me to ever pick it out. I love the sonic booms, though; I'm going to miss them...
Member Since: November 8, 2009 Posts: 4 Comments: 11302
138. Skyepony (Mod) 7:27 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Cloudsat caught that storm over LA/southern MS early this morning. WOW..
Member Since: August 10, 2005 Posts: 145 Comments: 29957
140. jeffs713 7:28 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Neapolitan:

Better than nothing...but a 747 can only carry a payload 5% or so of the way to orbiting altitude, and to less than 4% of orbital velocity

I'm sad to see the shuttle program go; my father worked on it after he and thousands of others were shifted over from the Apollo program, so there's a tinge of sentimentality to me. But private enterprise has proven that it'll be able to do it cheaper and safer, so I'm all for it. (I can name a dozen acquaintances right now who've fled NASA or one of its subs for work in the private space sector, and they all seem happy and excited about the future.) To me, NASA did the Charles Lindbergh thing by exploring new territory; now the Virgin Galactic and SpaceX folks need to take the reins, much as Pan Am and Braniff took over workaday aviation.

The good news for NASA, of course, is that the private sector won't be getting into the deep-space stuff; that will need to remain a government (multi-government) deal for the time being...

The other thing with a 747 is that you are limited in physical volume that you can strap under a wing, and stapping it onto the belly is a bit... um... problematic. It is much easier to bolt a few hundred thousand pounds to a top of a 747, but then how do you launch it from there without roasting the 747?
Member Since: August 3, 2008 Posts: 15 Comments: 5729
141. Jedkins01 7:28 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Neapolitan:

Better than nothing...but a 747 can only carry a payload 5% or so of the way to orbiting altitude, and to less than 4% of orbital velocity

I'm sad to see the shuttle program go; my father worked on it after he and thousands of others were shifted over from the Apollo program, so there's a tinge of sentimentality to me. But private enterprise has proven that it'll be able to do it cheaper and safer, so I'm all for it. (I can name a dozen acquaintances right now who've fled NASA or one of its subs for work in the private space sector, and they all seem happy and excited about the future.) To me, NASA did the Charles Lindbergh thing by exploring new territory; now the Virgin Galactic and SpaceX folks need to take the reins, much as Pan Am and Braniff took over workaday aviation.

The good news for NASA, of course, is that the private sector won't be getting into the deep-space stuff; that will need to remain a government (multi-government) deal for the time being...


Yeah, it is sad to see the space shuttle program ending. At least it marks the beginning of potentially an exciting future for space travel. I would support deep space exploration. Many would disagree, but in the late 1800's there were many fundamentalists who hated the rapid advancement of technology and new changes in transportation. Some people just like being stuck inside their little box and are afraid to come out.
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5420
143. Jedkins01 7:30 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting atmoaggie:
That's ~15 miles from home. 4 miles from work.

Was a small nado. See Pat's Vid. (same event)



Ohhh ok, interesting, sounds like a gustnado maybe? We get tons of those in the wet season with strong sea breeze thunderstorms here in Central FL
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5420
144. Patrap 7:30 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Enterprise / 747 First Glide Test Flight 1977

Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 377 Comments: 112968
145. atmoaggie 7:30 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Skyepony:
Cloudsat caught that storm over LA/southern MS early this morning. WOW..
Yep. In our satellite displays (cannot post any of it here), we saw a huge area of 40,000 foot, and up, cloud tops. Even the "stratiform" rain was from 40k cloud tops.

The deepest convection was not as limited to a thin line, like usual with a passing front.
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
146. Jedkins01 7:31 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Surfcropper:


Cause it ain't no Dodge


Of course it ain't no dodge, its better!
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5420
147. jeffs713 7:31 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Skyepony:
Cloudsat caught that storm over LA/southern MS early this morning. WOW..

WOW is right. If you compare that section with section #1 (over the Amazon), you will notice quite a few similarities. Impressive, to say the least.
Member Since: August 3, 2008 Posts: 15 Comments: 5729
148. atmoaggie 7:32 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Jedkins01:


yeah, maples are not nearly as strong as oaks in Florida. Most trees in Florida are way more durable then they are up north. I remember spending part of the summer up in Michigan with my relatives, what was just an average thunderstorm on a a cold front too me, apparently isn't for trees up there. 40 mph gusts or something around that did more damage in the Detroit suburb to trees and power lines than 75 mph does to trees and power lines here in North Pinellas County. It takes more than 70 mph do any real damage to trees and power lines here.
That's all about frequency...

If they had 40 mph winds multiple times per year, far, far less damage would result from any one event.
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
149. atmoaggie 7:35 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting Jedkins01:



Ohhh ok, interesting, sounds like a gustnado maybe? We get tons of those in the wet season with strong sea breeze thunderstorms here in Central FL
Maybe. The only wind ob we have that was near an observed nado was at KMSY (NOLA international).

Rain wrapped nado reported close by (by a skywarn-trained met) about the same time KMSY recorded a 77 mph gust.

Rare thing to have that good an ob with a small nado, even if it was only nearby (prolly within a mile).
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 6 Comments: 12461
150. Jedkins01 7:35 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting atmoaggie:
Almost 9 inches per hour rainfall rate...

I thought it a bit astounding and unbelievable at first. Not so sure it isn't possibly correct, now, tho.


Yeah that is amazing, my rain gauge has recorded a rainfall rate as high as 7 inches per hour for a very brief moment, but usually the biggest storms of the wet season in the soupiest air masses output around 4 to 5 inches per hour.

Its hard to imagine that it occurred this time of year with less moisture in the air, rather than July or August. Go figure, weather can be a mystery sometimes. There must have been incredible moisture converge and pooling in that local area, combined with very strong forcing and lift. Also it must have been a very strong and very tall cell
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5420
151. Jedkins01 7:36 PM GMT on March 09, 2011    
Quoting atmoaggie:
That's all about frequency...

If they had 40 mph winds multiple times per year, far, far less damage would result from any one event.


Good point.
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5420

Viewing: 101 - 151

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity