Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Did Hurricane Wilma have 209 mph sustained winds?
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 1:00 PM GMT on April 28, 2012 +51
At last week's 30th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology of the American Meteorological Society, Dr. Eric Uhlhorn of NOAA's Hurricane Research Division presented a poster that looked at the relationship between surface winds measured by the SFMR instrument and flight-level winds in two Category 5 storms. Hurricane Hunter flights done into Category 5 Supertyphoon Megi (17 October 2010) and Category 5 Hurricane Felix (03 September 2007) found that the surface winds measured by SFMR were greater than those measured at flight level (10,000 feet.) Usually, surface winds in a hurricane are 10 - 15% less than at 10,000 feet, but he showed that in super-intense Category 5 storms with small eyes, the dynamics of these situations may generate surface winds that are as strong or stronger than those found at 10,000 feet. He extrapolated this statistical relationship (using the inertial stability measured at flight level) to Hurricane Wilma of 2005, which was the strongest hurricane on record (882 mb), but was not observed by the SFMR. He estimated that the maximum wind averaged around the eyewall in Wilma at peak intensity could have been 209 mph, plus or minus 20 mph--so conceivably as high as 229 mph, with gusts to 270 mph. Yowza. That's well in excess of the 200 mph minimum wind speed a top end EF-5 tornado has. The Joplin, Missouri EF-5 tornado of May 22, 2011 had winds estimated at 225 - 250 mph. That tornado ripped pavement from the ground, leveled buildings to the concrete slabs they were built on, and killed 161 people. It's not a pretty thought to consider what Wilma would have done to Cancun, Key West, or Fort Myers had the hurricane hit with sustained winds of what the Joplin tornado had.


Figure 1. Hurricane Wilma's pinhole eye as seen at 8:22 a.m. CDT Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2005, by the crew aboard NASA's international space station as the complex flew 222 miles above the storm. At the time, Wilma was the strongest Atlantic hurricane in history, with a central pressure of 882 mb and sustained surface winds estimated at 185 mph. The storm was located in the Caribbean Sea, 340 miles southeast of Cozumel, Mexico. Image source: NASA's Space Photo Gallery.


Figure 2. Damage in Joplin, Missouri after the EF-5 tornado of May 22, 2011. Image credit: wunderphotographer thebige.

Official all-time strongest winds in an Atlantic hurricane: 190 mph
The official record for strongest winds in an Atlantic hurricane is 190 mph, for Hurricane Allen of 1980 as it was entering the Gulf of Mexico, and for Hurricane Camille of 1969, as it was making landfall in Pass Christian, Mississippi. In Dr. Bob Sheets' and Jack Williams' book, Hurricane Watch, they recount the Hurricane Hunters flight into Camile as the hurricane reached peak intensity: On Sunday afternoon, August 17, and Air Force C-130 piloted by Marvin Little penetrated Camille's eye and measured a pressure of 26.62 inches of mercury. "Just as we were nearing the eyewall cloud we suddenly broke into a clear area and could see the sea surface below," the copilot, Robert Lee Clark, wrote in 1982. "What a sight! Although everyone on the crew was experienced except me, no one had seen the wind whip the sea like that before...Instead of the green and white splotches normally found in a storm, the sea surface was in deep furrows running along the wind direction....The velocity was beyond the descriptions used in our training and far beyond anything we had ever seen." So, the 190 mph winds of Camille were an estimate that was off the scale from anything that had ever been observed in the past. The books that the Hurricane Hunters carried, filled with photos of the sea state at various wind speeds, only goes up to 150 mph (Figure 2). I still used this book to estimate surface winds when I flew with the Hurricane Hunters in the late 1980s, and the books are still carried on the planes today. In the two Category 5 hurricanes I flew into, Hugo and Gilbert, I never observed the furrowing effect referred to above. Gilbert had surface winds estimated at 175 mph based on what we measured at flight level, so I believe the 190 mph wind estimate in Camille may be reasonable.


Figure 3. Appearance of the sea surface in winds of 130 knots (150 mph). Image credit: Wind Estimations from Aerial Observations of Sea Conditions (1954), by Charlie Neumann.


Figure 4. Radar image of Hurricane Camille taken at 22:15 UTC August 17, 1969, a few hours before landfall in Mississippi. At the time, Camille had the highest sustained winds of any Atlantic hurricane in history--190 mph.

The infamous hurricane hunter flight into Wilma during its rapid intensification
While I was at last week's conference, I had a conversation with Rich Henning, a flight meteorologist for NOAA's Hurricane Hunters, who served for many years as a Air Reconnaissance Weather Officer (ARWO) for the Air Force Hurricane Hunters. Rich told me the story of the Air Force Hurricane Hunter mission into Hurricane Wilma in the early morning hours of October 19, 2005, as Wilma entered its explosive deepening phase. The previous airplane, which had departed Category 1 Wilma six hours previously, flew through Wilma at an altitude of 5,000 feet. They measured a central pressure of 954 mb when they departed the eye at 23:10 UTC. The crew of the new plane assumed that the hurricane, though intensifying, was probably not a major hurricane, and decided that they would also go in at 5,000 feet. Winds outside the eyewall were less than hurricane force, so this seemed like a reasonable assumption. Once the airplane hit the eyewall, they realized their mistake. Flight level winds quickly rose to 186 mph, far in excess of Category 5 strength, and severe turbulence rocked the aircraft. The aircraft was keeping a constant pressure altitude to maintain their height above the ocean during the penetration, but the area of low pressure at Wilma's center was so intense that the airplane descended at over 1,000 feet per minute during the penetration in order to maintain a constant pressure altitude. By they time they punched into the incredibly tiny 4-mile wide eye, which had a central pressure of just 901 mb at 04:32 UTC, the plane was at a dangerously low altitude of 1,500 feet--not a good idea in a Category 5 hurricane. The pilot ordered an immediate climb, and the plane exited the other side of Wilma's eyewall at an altitude of 10,000 feet. They maintained this altitude for the remainder of the flight. During their next pass through the eye at 06:11 UTC, the diameter of the eye had shrunk to an incredibly tiny two miles--the smallest hurricane eye ever measured. During their third and final pass through the eye at 0801 UTC, a dropsonde found a central pressure of 882 mb--the lowest pressure ever observed in an Atlantic hurricane. In the span of just 24 hours, Wilma had intensified from a 70 mph tropical storm to a 175 mph category 5 hurricane--an unprecedented event for an Atlantic hurricane. Since the pressure was still falling, it is likely that Wilma became even stronger after the mission departed.

I'll have a new post by Tuesday at the latest.

Jeff Masters
Categories: Hurricane
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 101 - 151

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39Blog Index

101. CybrTeddy 3:47 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting EugeneTillman:
CybrTeddy, BahaHurican, ScottLincoln, and to anyone else who replied to my original comment - Thanks. And did some research of my own expounding on those comments and got some good info.


Anytime!
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 253 Comments: 20201
102. BahaHurican 3:51 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting AtHomeInTX:
I do apologize. I certainly didn't mean to be insensitive or flippant about the dangers the men and women flying into these storms face. Nor do I discount the importance of what they do. I'm very grateful. Sorry DRM. I was only referring to the beauty of flying in the eye, seeing the eye wall, etc. I'm one of the biggest advocates of safety and evacuation. And never advocate taking unnecessary risks. I know how awful these storms are. And have shed many tears. Still do. As horrible as these storms are the absolute worse part is loss of life. So be prepared and stay safe everyone. I'll bow out now.
I don't know what post u r responding to, but I think most of us can identify with the potential wonder of seeing the power and beauty of a cat 5 from above, even if it's not something they themselves may want to experience. I don't think even the Doc would be offended. After all, he's done what most of us haven't, that is, fly into the eye of an intensifying hurricane.

I gotta head out now... was waiting on someone but now need to leave.

Have fun ya'll.
Member Since: October 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17592
103. Gearsts 3:53 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Member Since: August 2, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 1989
104. stormwatcherCI 3:58 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting seflagamma:


OK, that makes sense because your area should have really strong codes also.
Yes. Our building codes actually exceed Florida building codes especially since Ivan.

BTW, we have had 4" of rain since midnight and still coming down hard. It is much needed.
Member Since: October 9, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 8038
105. luvtogolf 4:07 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Can someone tell me what the latest El Nino forecast is? Last time I was on a couple of weeks ago there was talk that the waters may have cooled just a little bit.

Thank you,
Member Since: June 12, 2011 Posts: 0 Comments: 366
106. Sfloridacat5 4:08 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
I've always heard that a 150 mph tornado is considerably more distructive (to the objects it hits) than a 150mph wind from a hurricane.

The reason explained was because the tornado's winds hit objects (cars, houses, etc) from multiple directions within seconds.

Any thoughts?
Member Since: September 16, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2026
107. CaribBoy 4:14 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
28 °C STTs are spreading northward accord the Lesser Antilles and the Caribbean. Things are heating up quickly now.. and with NAO coming.. you know the rest.
Member Since: October 6, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2846
108. NYX 4:14 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting BahaHurican:
I don't know what post u r responding to, but I think most of us can identify with the potential wonder of seeing the power and beauty of a cat 5 from above, even if it's not something they themselves may want to experience. I don't think even the Doc would be offended. After all, he's done what most of us haven't, that is, fly into the eye of an instensifying hurricane.

I gotta head out now... was waiting on someone but now need to leave.

Have fun ya'll.


I might have reservations with flying on a Space Shuttle but I wouldn't hesitate for a minute to join a hurricane hunter crew on a mission.
Member Since: August 27, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 27
109. CaribBoy 4:21 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
I can't wait to leave europe for the caribbean :)
Member Since: October 6, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 2846
110. Grothar 4:27 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
There were a number of things odd about Wilma. By looking at the radar loop, it was assumed that the large eye was calm, since it appeared to have no weather inside. However, anyone who was in that area knows that the winds never stopped once. Even Brian Norcross (the local weatherman) was telling people that they were in the calm part of the storm and the winds were ferocious. I never saw a hurricane do that. The other noticable thing, was that the winds were more tornadic in nature, rather that blowing in one direction. They were twisting the entire time until that east wall came over. Anyone else in the area notice this?



Member Since: July 17, 2009 Posts: 56 Comments: 19504
111. hydrus 4:30 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Florida should get some decent rain.
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
112. hydrus 4:33 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
113. CybrTeddy 4:34 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
It's so far a bit more warm than I was expecting today in my area in FL. It was predicted to be only 88 for a high by WU, it's 12pm and it's 87 already. Probably tops out at 90 today.

That Florida Heat that we all have come to know and love/hate has returned. Plus the lovebugs are back too, actually on the right time this year. I think it was in 2010 that I didn't see a mass of lovebugs until September.

Anyways, once the severe thunderstorms start cropping up on a daily basis, Florida Summer starts for me. Probably will start seeing that in about two weeks or so.
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 253 Comments: 20201
114. Jedkins01 4:42 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting Grothar:
There were a number of things odd about Wilma. By looking at the radar loop, it was assumed that the large eye was calm, since it appeared to have no weather inside. However, anyone who was in that area knows that the winds never stopped once. Even Brian Norcross (the local weatherman) was telling people that they were in the calm part of the storm and the winds were ferocious. I never saw a hurricane do that. The other noticable thing, was that the winds were more tornadic in nature, rather that blowing in one direction. They were twisting the entire time until that east wall came over. Anyone else in the area notice this?






I didn't experience Wilma, but I can certainly agree it was a very strange hurricane, what was also very strange is the lack of weakening as it crossed the state. It was a strange system from its very beginning through the rest of it's period of existence. Even as it accelerated across the Atlantic across colder waters it remained a powerful hurricane for a long time. I believe it was also strange how quickly it got its act back together after sitting over Mexico for a while. Almost every time I've seen hurricanes move back over water after being significantly weakened over land, it normally takes much longer to re-strengthen, and many times the surface winds never hold close to winds just above the surface again, as was the case with hurricane Dennis, from what I remember, its impacts and actual winds at landfall were a lot weaker than was expected.
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5322
115. hydrus 4:43 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting Grothar:
There were a number of things odd about Wilma. By looking at the radar loop, it was assumed that the large eye was calm, since it appeared to have no weather inside. However, anyone who was in that area knows that the winds never stopped once. Even Brian Norcross (the local weatherman) was telling people that they were in the calm part of the storm and the winds were ferocious. I never saw a hurricane do that. The other noticable thing, was that the winds were more tornadic in nature, rather that blowing in one direction. They were twisting the entire time until that east wall came over. Anyone else in the area notice this?



Wilma did a lot more damage in S.E.Florida than they thought it would..A downtown Miami office building after WilmaAmazing pin-hole eye.. Thankfully not over Florida..
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
116. hydrus 4:51 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
$700 million
Haiti 12 $500 thousand
Jamaica 1 $93.5 million
Mexico 8 $7.5 billion
United States 36 $21 billion
Total 63 $29 billion

Wilma was responsible for at least 63 total deaths and over $29 billion (2005 US$) in damages.Wilma made several landfalls, with the most destructive effects felt in the Yucatán Peninsula of Mexico, Cuba, and the US state of Florida. At least 62 deaths were reported, and damage is estimated at $29.1 billion (2005 USD, $34.6 billion 2012 USD), $20.6 billion (2005 USD, $24.5 billion 2012 USD) of which occurred in the United States alone. As a result, Wilma is ranked among the top five most costly hurricanes ever recorded in the Atlantic and the fourth most costly storm in United States history.
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
117. ncstorm 4:51 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
GFS







Member Since: August 19, 2006 Posts: 7 Comments: 8363
118. hydrus 4:53 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting Jedkins01:



I didn't experience Wilma, but I can certainly agree it was a very strange hurricane, what was also very strange is the lack of weakening as it crossed the state. It was a strange system from its very beginning through the rest of it's period of existence. Even as it accelerated across the Atlantic across colder waters it remained a powerful hurricane for a long time. I believe it was also strange how quickly it got its act back together after sitting over Mexico for a while. Almost every time I've seen hurricanes move back over water after being significantly weakened over land, it normally takes much longer to re-strengthen, and many times the surface winds never hold close to winds just above the surface again, as was the case with hurricane Dennis, from what I remember, its impacts and actual winds at landfall were a lot weaker than was expected.
?
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
119. LargoFl 4:53 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Member Since: August 6, 2011 Posts: 0 Comments: 22421
120. PedleyCA 4:58 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting hydrus:
Far out.That has got to be a weird feeling. I have never felt an earthquake, hope I never do..Good and safe morning to you Pedley.


Been thru the 6.6 1971 Sylmar Earthquake and the 1994 Northridge Earthquake which was a 6.7 and had 1.7G ground acceleration. That one was one to remember. I was in Castaic, CA for the first one and Burbank, CA for the last one. So that last one was real close, 10-15 miles like this one but that one was huge by comparison to today's Quake.
Member Since: February 29, 2012 Posts: 0 Comments: 2135
121. Grothar 4:59 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting Jedkins01:



I didn't experience Wilma, but I can certainly agree it was a very strange hurricane, what was also very strange is the lack of weakening as it crossed the state. It was a strange system from its very beginning through the rest of it's period of existence. Even as it accelerated across the Atlantic across colder waters it remained a powerful hurricane for a long time. I believe it was also strange how quickly it got its act back together after sitting over Mexico for a while. Almost every time I've seen hurricanes move back over water after being significantly weakened over land, it normally takes much longer to re-strengthen, and many times the surface winds never hold close to winds just above the surface again, as was the case with hurricane Dennis, from what I remember, its impacts and actual winds at landfall were a lot weaker than was expected.


It was strange. I've been through many hurricanes, going back to 1948,which was the first I can remember. (Contrary to popular belief, I do not remember the hurricane of 1780) While I have been through worse (Andrew, for instance) These winds were nothing like any I can remember. Trees actually twisted from the tops and flew into the air, rather than being blown down.
Member Since: July 17, 2009 Posts: 56 Comments: 19504
122. Jedkins01 5:02 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting hydrus:
?



What's the confusion about?
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5322
123. Grothar 5:06 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting seflagamma:


I know central and northeast Florida is very dry and having wild fires..
We have had a wetter than normal dry season down here...

wish some of this would come up your way..


Hey gamma! If you are still on, can you hear those jets going over? We are having an Air Show today on the beach. With that rain coming in,it might be cancelled. Looks like some heavy storms this afternoon.
Member Since: July 17, 2009 Posts: 56 Comments: 19504
124. hydrus 5:10 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting Jedkins01:



What's the confusion about?
When was Wilma weaker than expected.?
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
125. TropicalAnalystwx13 5:11 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting hydrus:
When was Wilma weaker than expected.?

You misunderstood. He was talking about how Hurricane Dennis didn't live up to its expections. Not Wilma. :P
Member Since: July 6, 2010 Posts: 89 Comments: 25213
126. hydrus 5:11 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting PedleyCA:


Been thru the 6.6 1971 Sylmar Earthquake and the 1994 Northridge Earthquake which was a 6.7 and had 1.7G ground acceleration. That one was one to remember. I was in Castaic, CA for the first one and Burbank, CA for the last one. So that last one was real close, 10-15 miles like this one but that one was huge by comparison to today's Quake.
Wasnt the San Fernando Earthquake in 71 too.?
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
127. hydrus 5:12 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting TropicalAnalystwx13:

You misunderstood. He was talking about how Hurricane Dennis didn't live up to its expections. Not Wilma. :P
My bad..Forgive me please..:)
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
128. hydrus 5:12 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting Jedkins01:



What's the confusion about?
My apologies Jed.
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
129. PedleyCA 5:14 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting hydrus:
Wasnt the San Fernando Earthquake in 71 too.?


Same Beast, different name.
Member Since: February 29, 2012 Posts: 0 Comments: 2135
131. Patrap 5:20 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Jazz Fest Radio, NOLA

www.wwoz.org
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111244
132. Patrap 5:21 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Please, anyone quoting the one before me, please consider your sanity.

Member Since: April 27, 2012 Posts: 0 Comments: 0


Report, flag, ignore.
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111244
133. Patrap 5:22 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111244
135. Grothar 5:25 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting hydrus:
My apologies Jed.


Pay attention, hydrus!
Member Since: July 17, 2009 Posts: 56 Comments: 19504
136. Grothar 5:26 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting MetMan2012:
Rainy afternoon down here, eh, Grothar?

How you've been, man!


Hola! No rain here, just clouds
Member Since: July 17, 2009 Posts: 56 Comments: 19504
137. Grothar 5:27 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting hydrus:
Wasnt the San Fernando Earthquake in 71 too.?

.
Member Since: July 17, 2009 Posts: 56 Comments: 19504
138. hydrus 5:36 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting Grothar:


Pay attention, hydrus!
Yes..I,m footing off on the wrong start.
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14248
139. RickWPB 5:42 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting Grothar:
There were a number of things odd about Wilma. By looking at the radar loop, it was assumed that the large eye was calm, since it appeared to have no weather inside. However, anyone who was in that area knows that the winds never stopped once. Even Brian Norcross (the local weatherman) was telling people that they were in the calm part of the storm and the winds were ferocious. I never saw a hurricane do that. The other noticable thing, was that the winds were more tornadic in nature, rather that blowing in one direction. They were twisting the entire time until that east wall came over. Anyone else in the area notice this?



What!? I live in West Palm Beach (Lake Worth actually) and I went outside in the eye of Wilma to survey for damage. It was a bit breezy in all different directions but not "ferocious" like you say. It stayed that way for about 30 mins. As everyone has said, the backside of Wilma was the worst.
Member Since: September 26, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 297
140. CybrTeddy 5:49 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
130. Que Pasa mi amigo!
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 253 Comments: 20201
141. TropicalAnalystwx13 5:52 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting Grothar:


Hola! No rain here, just clouds

Grothar...you know better than to quote the troll.
Member Since: July 6, 2010 Posts: 89 Comments: 25213
143. LargoFl 5:57 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
3.8 today.............
Member Since: August 6, 2011 Posts: 0 Comments: 22421
144. LargoFl 5:57 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting LargoFl:
3.8 today.............
gee that didnt come out, was in california
Member Since: August 6, 2011 Posts: 0 Comments: 22421
145. PedleyCA 5:58 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting LargoFl:
3.8 today.............


Those maps are not user friendly.
Member Since: February 29, 2012 Posts: 0 Comments: 2135
146. PedleyCA 6:00 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting LargoFl:
gee that didnt come out, was in california


Was 4.1 earlier. It was in Crestline, CA now 3.8
Member Since: February 29, 2012 Posts: 0 Comments: 2135
147. ncstorm 6:06 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
CMC



Member Since: August 19, 2006 Posts: 7 Comments: 8363
148. washingtonian115 6:10 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
And the word for today is.....Pinhole eye.
Member Since: August 14, 2010 Posts: 5 Comments: 10618
149. PedleyCA 6:12 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting washingtonian115:
And the word for today is.....Pinhole eye.


Good Day to you 115, pinhole eye it is then. Phrase of the Day....
Member Since: February 29, 2012 Posts: 0 Comments: 2135
150. washingtonian115 6:16 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Quoting PedleyCA:


Good Day to you 115, pinhole eye it is then. Phrase of the Day....
Hey.Well it would make since,since Wilma had a pinhole eye and so did the other intense hurricanes the Doc mentioned.
Member Since: August 14, 2010 Posts: 5 Comments: 10618
151. TropicalAnalystwx13 6:25 PM GMT on April 28, 2012    
Member Since: July 6, 2010 Posts: 89 Comments: 25213

Viewing: 101 - 151

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity