Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog |
|
| Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 4:11 PM GMT on October 30, 2005 | +0 |
| Permalink | A A A |
|
|
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.
|
Tropical Blogs
Tropical Weather Stickers®
Page: 1 — Blog Index
thnx for the update
I have a question for you. I live in the West Boynton Bech area which is just south west of WPB. I live about 2.5 miles from a middle school (Christa McCulla) that locked a wind gust of 118mph.
I would like to know why the back part of the storm, or the southern eyewall seemed to be very dry. I found that interesting because the winds seemed to have been stronger, but for about 30-45 mins during the southern eyewall, it didn't rain. Is that normal during a hurricane?
please post a reply if you can. Thanks
PK
Accuweather has twice made mention of a Beta remnant ending up near Florida by the end of this week. Anyone else have an opinion on that? Normally I wouldn't be so paranoid, but with 2/3 of my roof tore off by Wilma and on the 7th day of no power (and not knowing when to expect it) I am a bit edgy right now. Thanks!
FSU.. you may want to email Dr. Masters directly with your question, I'm interested in the response as well. That south side of the storm was nasty.
Many of the models show the blob affecting even to bahamas, 2 kiss fl. Then it turns NE, because beta rements to verying degrees of organization~ fly through fl. Some models in panhandle out Ga, Tampa to Jacksonville(probibly most popular), central or south fl. Looks like atleast a bit of rain~ 84hrs or so out. Model links: navy, fsu ~ an easy one mrf
~perhaps not time to call it end of season
billsfaninsofla, seems beta is going west/south, to the pacific after bouncing of well defined ridge. It may also dissipate, currently best guess is 60MPH and still not reaching the high mountain 3,000 ft plus, crossing at middle of nicaragua.
First off let me say sorry about the game yesterday. Not Really. You got it right on the cold front. The local weather guys here were saying that the cold front filtered into the backside of the storm about halfway across the state. They said that because cold air finds its way to the surface much quicker that it filled in the backside of the eye really quick. Thus the strong second half we all experienced here. If you look at the radar images you will see that back half fill in really quickly once it merges with the cold front.
Hope that these lower Sea Surface Temps result in an end to major hurricanes reaching the US for this season. Seems like we used to have more tropical storms making landfall in the US than hurricanes, but not the last two seasons. I guess that's because of the warmer SS Temps. If these trends continue for major landfalling hurricanes in highly populated areas of the US for the future, the insurance rates will go out of sight. Maybe we have seen the worst of it. I sure hope so.
Tornadoty's list of records is a must read - thanks!
Thanks to Dr. Jeff too and everyone's contributions!
"Thunderbolts on demand
What would a military strategist gain in having an "on-switch" to the weather?
Clearly, it offers the ability to degrade the effectiveness of enemy forces. That could come from flooding an opponent’s encampment or airfield to generating downright downpours that disrupt enemy troop comfort levels. On the flipside, sparking a drought that cuts off fresh water can stir up morale problems for warfighting foes.
Even fooling around with fog and clouds can deny or create concealment – whichever weather manipulation does the needed job.
In this regard, nanotechnology could be utilized to create clouds of tiny smart particles. Atmospherically buoyant, these ultra-small computer particles could navigate themselves to block optical sensors. Alternatively, they might be used to provide an atmospheric electrical potential difference -- a way to precisely aim and time lightning strikes over the enemy’s head – thereby concoct thunderbolts on demand.
Perhaps that’s too far out for some. But some blue sky thinkers have already looked into these and other scenarios in "Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025" – a research paper written by a seven person team of military officers and presented in 1996 as part of a larger study dubbed Air Force 2025."
"Pulling it all together
The report on weather-altering ideas underscored the capacity to harness such power in the not too distant future.
"Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries," the report stated. "The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together," the authors noted.
In 2025, the report summarized, U.S. aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications.
"Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures," the report concluded.
But if whipping up weather can be part of a warfighter’s tool kit, couldn’t those talents be utilized to retarget or neutralize life, limb and property-destroying storms?"
I dont know about ya'll, but this concerns me..... what are the adverse effects of "messing with mother nature".... and could this be used to create storms (tropical?) as weapons???
lot's to ponder! ;)
Viewing: 1 - 24
Page: 1 — Blog Index