2006: sixth warmest year on record
The planet's high fever abated only slightly in 2006 compared to 2005, according to preliminary figures issued by the National Climatic Data Center on Thursday. Following the warmest year on record for the globe in 2005, the annual global temperature for 2006 is expected to be sixth warmest since record keeping began in 1880. The annual averaged global temperature was 0.52�C (+0.94�F) above normal, just 0.09�C below the record set in 2005. Very little of the globe was cooler than normal in 2006--only Siberia had temperatures more than 1� C cooler than average (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Temperature departures from normal for 2006, based on preliminary data from the National Climatic Data Center.
U.S. Temperatures
The 2006 annual average temperature for the contiguous United States (based on preliminary data) will likely be 2�F (1.1�C) above the 20th Century mean, which would make 2006 the third warmest year on record. Only 1998 and 1934 were warmer than 2006. Three months in 2006 (January, April and July) were either the warmest or second warmest on record. Only September and October were cooler than average. A quick look at the jet stream pattern for the remainder of 2006, as forecast by the GFS model, reveals a continuation of the abnormal warmth we've seen over most of the U.S. this month. There will be very few regions of the country experiencing a white Christmas this year.
European temperatures
The Meteorlogical Office of England announced yesterday that 2006 was the warmest year in England since record keeping began in 1659. The years 1990 and 1999 shared the record, previously. The weather this Fall has been the warmest ever recorded over most of western Europe. One UK newspaper trumpeted the headline yesterday, "The hottest year since 1659 spells global doom". I don't agree that the hottest year ever in one small country is evidence that global doom is approaching. However, the statistics of what has happened globally the past 30 years speak volumes. Including 2006, six of the seven warmest years on record have occurred since 2001 and the ten warmest years have occurred since 1995. The global average surface temperature has risen between 0.6�C and 0.7�C (1.1 - 1.3� F) since the start of the 20th Century, and the rate of increase since 1976 has been approximately three times faster than the mean for the past 100 years. If the rate of warming since 1976 (Figure 2)--0.55�C in 30 years--is sustained the remainder of this century, the Earth will be a full 2�C warmer in 2100 than it was in 1990. This amount of warming would be tremendously costly to society and highly damaging to many ecosystems.
Figure 2. Temperature departures from normal for 1880-2006. Source: National Climatic Data Center.
The globe is undeniably warming at rapid rate, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if 2007 surpasses the global temperature record set in 2005, since we are entering 2007 with a moderate El Ni�o event on our hands. El Ni�o conditions add a tremendous amount of heat to the Earth's surface, and the current El Ni�o--which is expected to last at least until May--should drive up global temperatures significantly. Global doom is not at hand, but the predictions by our best climate scientists of a 1.4 to 5.8�C increase in global temperatures between 1990 and 2100 are quite believable and need to be taken seriously.
Next week, I plan to talk about the not-so-cheerful study published in Geophysical Research Letters this week titled, Future abrupt reductions in the summer Arctic sea ice. A sudden and complete disintegration of the North Polar ice cap could happen by 2040, according to some computer model calculations.
Jeff Masters
Reader Comments
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 — Blog Index
the peat bogs in norhtern Canada and Russia hold more co2 that we could dream of making so I'm saying that natural elements can have a larger impact and probably do than us.
I am reminded of when Buckminster Fuller was asked when mankind would journey into space. Old Bucky replied vigorously: "We are in space!"
It is similarly incorrect to make a distinction between "us" and "nature". We are part of nature, and if we provide the kick start to thaw out all that peat you are talking about then well ... nature is as nature does.
Clclone, there isnt too much doubt that fire of one kind or another created the situation we now face. Thats what I mean when I refer to CO2 anyway. I'm talking burning forrest, hydrocarbons, whatever.
http://www.stormsurf.com/page2/links/etaslp.html
1998 7"7"
99 7' 7.5''
00 7' 0 "
01 4 ' 2.5 "
02 6 ' 2 "
03 6' 2.5 "
04 6 ' 7 "
05 6' 2"
06 to date 7' 2 "
Here's some SST anamoly stuff.
Initally I thought maybe we can blame it on the duldrums (lack of winds)...but we can't.
I found just what your looking for for March 1, 2005, but I can't find one older to compare. Came from here.
Tangent but interesting from there was..
Colder NAO winters are therefore generally followed by increased chance of hurricanes in the eastern and southeastern U.S.
Was a warm winter last year, in a NAO pos year, easy season...repeat? We'll see.
Enough tangets, night ya'll.
A lot of noreasters do develop something of a warm core, since they spend a lot of time over the Gulf Stream. Only rarely do they turn truly tropical in nature. JeffMasters did a piece on that a while ago.
Viewing: 351 - 397
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 — Blog Index