Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Second warmest March on record; will La Niña be gone by hurricane season?
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 6:47 PM GMT on April 23, 2008 +2
March 2008 was the 2nd warmest March for the the globe on record, according to statistics released by the National Climatic Data Center. Over the Northern Hemisphere, and over all of the globe's land areas, March 2008 was the warmest March in the 128-year global record. Only the presence of a moderately strong La Niña event that cooled ocean waters in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific prevented March 2008 from surpassing March 2002 as the warmest March on record. March broke a string of three straight months when the globe did not record a top ten warmest month ever. Between February 2006 and November 2007, the globe set top ten monthly warm temperature records for 22 straight months.


Figure 1. Departure of temperature from average (the anomaly) for March of 2008, the second warmest March on record for the globe. While the U.S. recorded slightly below average temperatures, much of Asia and Europe saw remarkably warm temperatures. Image credit: National Climatic Data Center.

How much cooling did La Niña give to the globe in March?
La Niña is a periodic cooling of the Equatorial waters of the Eastern Pacific that occurs every 3-7 years. The cooling is due to a natural cycle of anomalous winds from the east that act to push surface waters away from the coast of South America, allowing cold water from deep in the ocean to rise to the surface to replace the surface waters blown to the west. These cool waters often cause a noticeable drop in global temperatures. Conversely, when the opposite phenomena occurs--an El Niño event, which brings anomalously warm Sea Surface Temperatures (SSTs) to the Equatorial Eastern Pacific, enough heat is added to the atmosphere that global temperatures warm significantly. According to Trenberth et al. (2002), a typical El Niño event increases global temperatures by about 0.1°C. Exceptional El Niño events, such as occurred in 1997-1998 and 1982-1983, increase global temperatures by up to 0.2°C. El Niño events heat the atmosphere by causing changes in cloudiness and atmospheric circulation, and through direct radiation of heat from the ocean to the atmosphere. There is a lag of 3-6 months between the time an El Niño event occurs and the time the atmosphere heats in response. Similarly, when a La Niña event occurs, heat is drawn out of the atmosphere and the oceans are recharged with heat. Global temperatures cool, again with a lag of 3-6 months. The correlation between global temperature anomalies and El Niño/La Niña temperature anomalies can be plainly seen in Figure 2. Note that the correlation is not perfect--there are some El Niño/La Niña events that do not affect the global temperature much. For example, global temperatures did not cool much during the strong 1988-1989 La Niña event. Therefore, it is a good bet--but not certain one--that had we not had a strong La Niña event this winter, March 2008 would have been the warmest March on record, since it missed the record by only 0.04°C.


Figure 2. Comparison of temperature anomalies in the equatorial Pacific Ocean bounded by a box between 5°S, 5°N, 120°W, and 180°W (the Niño 3.4 region) and global temperatures for 1950-1998. Means for 1950-1976 and 1977-1998 (horizontal lines) are shown separately to highlight a climate shift that occurred in 1976/1977. The reasons for this shift are unknown. Note that when an El Niño event occurs, the globe tends to warm by about 0.1°C, and when a La Niña event occurs, the globe tends to cool. Image credit: American Geophysical Union's Journal of Geophysical Research.

Warmest month ever stats
It is interesting to compare what the phase of El Niño/La Niña was during each of the 12 record warmest months the globe has recorded. If we adjust for the 3-6 month lag between an El Niño/La Niña event and the monthly global temperature records, it turns out that nine of the twelve monthly records were set when an El Niño event occurred during the 3-6 month period prior to the record. Considering that climatologically El Niño conditions are present only about 25% of the time, El Niño has a major impact on when record global warmth will occur. The warmest year on record, 1998, occurred during the strongest El Niño of the past century. The table below compares the 12 monthly global temperature records with the temperature in the Niño 3.4 region (a 3-month average centered four months before the record was set). El Niño events, which occur when the Niño 3.4 index is greater than 0.4°C, are marked with an "E".

Record......Niño 3.4 index
-----------------------------
Jan 2007 +0.7 E
Feb 1998 +1.7 E
Mar 2002 -0.1
Apr 1998 +2.5 E
May 1998 +2.3 E
Jun 2005 +0.5 E
Jul 1998 +1.4 E
Aug 1998 +1.1 E
Sep 2005 +0.5 E
Oct 2003 +0.0
Nov 2004 +0.7 E
Dec 2003 +0.4


Figure 3. A La Niña event exists when ocean surface temperatures in the equatorial Pacific Ocean bounded by a box between 5°S, 5°N, 120°W, and 180°W (the Niño 3.4 region) are cooler than 0.4°C below average (based on means from 1971-2000). La Niña events between 0.5°C and 0.9°C are referred to as weak, 1.0°C and 1.4°C are moderate, and 1.5°C or cooler, strong. The winter of 2007-2008 saw strong La Niña conditions, but this has weakened to a moderate event in March. Image credit: NOAA Climate Prediction Center.

An El Niño by hurricane season?
Presence of El Niño conditions usually causes enhanced levels of wind shear over the Atlantic, reducing hurricane activity, so it would be nice to see an El Niño this Fall. The strong La Niña event we had over the past winter has weakened considerably in the past two months, and is now classified as a moderate event, according to the latest El Niño discussion issued by NOAA's Climate Prediction Center. There is some hope that an El Niño will develop by hurricane season. Two of the long-range computer models are now calling for an El Niño to develop by hurricane season (Figure 4), and none of them were calling for El Niño last month. However, there is probably not time for a full-fledged El Niño event to develop, and it is expected that we will have weak La Niña or neutral conditions this hurricane season. Since reliable El Niño records began in 1950, there has never been a switch over to El Niño by hurricane season from a La Niña as strong as the one we have now. Columbia University's International Research Institute is predicting that neutral El Niño conditions are most likely for the coming hurricane season (57% chance), with a 20% chance of an El Niño, and 23% chance of a La Niña. This is pretty much what climatology says--on average, we experience El Niño conditions 25% of the time and La Niña conditions 25% of the time.


Figure 4. Computer model forecasts of El Niño/La Niña made in April. The forecasts that go above the red line at +0.5°C denote El Niño conditions; -0.5°C to +0.5°C denote neutral conditions, and below -0.5°C denote La Niña conditions. Image credit: Columbia University's IRI.

References
Trenberth, K. E., J. M. Caron, D. P. Stepaniak, and S. Worley, >Evolution of El Niño, Southern Oscillation and global atmospheric surface temperatures", J. Geophys. Res., 107(D8), 4065, doi:10.1029/2000JD000298, 2002.

I'll be in Orlando next week for the American Meteorological Society's bi-annual hurricane conference, and plan to make some quick posts during the week to update everyone on the latest hurricane research. I may make one more post before then.

Jeff Masters
Categories: Climate Summaries
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 551 - 601

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23Blog Index

551. SouthDadeFish 3:28 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
JFV are you talking about Miami Dade Community College? If so I didn't know they had a meteorology program.
Member Since: August 12, 2007 Posts: 11 Comments: 2413
552. Ivansrvivr 3:30 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
523
Ivan max sustained 125, pressure 931 from 939
Katrina max sustained 125, pressure 925 from 913

Those 2 were about even but Ivan was strengthening, Katrina was weakening. Katrina was larger than Ivan, that was never in question. Katrina's larger size made made it's massive surge sustainable which was nightmare for MS/AL coastal towns. Katrina's surge went inland for miles. The Panhandle of Florida is less surge prone so was somewhat protected from similar surge from Ivan.

This whole conversation goes back to my original point, that the 1 in 100 year event is the one that hits you. There have been many worse than Ivan and Katrina (like Hugo or Camille) in past but the big one is the one you get.
553. Ivansrvivr 3:32 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Congrats JFV. If i was better at (complex) math I'd go to school for Met myself. I can handle the Met part, but not the very complex math.
554. SouthDadeFish 3:34 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Ivan, I always thought Hurricane Ivan weakened prior to making landfall. Here's from wikipedia:

Just before it made landfall in the United States, Ivan's eyewall weakened considerably, and its southwestern portion almost disappeared. Around 2 a.m. CDT September 16 (0700 UTC), Ivan made landfall on the U.S. mainland in Orange Beach, Alabama as a Category 3 hurricane with 120 mph (190 km/h) winds. Ivan then continued inland, maintaining hurricane strength until it was over central Alabama. Ivan weakened rapidly that evening and became a tropical depression the same day, still over Alabama. Ivan lost tropical characteristics on September 18 while crossing Virginia.

But I guess you would know. :~)
Member Since: August 12, 2007 Posts: 11 Comments: 2413
556. SouthDadeFish 3:40 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
And also this is from the NHC and their Tropical Cyclone Report:

Shortly after emerging over the southern Gulf of Mexico early on 14 September, Ivan turned north-northwestward and then northward. A steady weakening trend also ensued as moderate southwesterly flow on the east side of a large mid- to upper-level trough over the central United States and northeastern Mexico gradually caused the vertical shear to increase across the hurricane. As Ivan neared the northern U.S. Gulf coast, the upper-level wind flow ahead of the trough became more westerly and strengthened to more than 30 kt, which helped to increase the shear even more and advect dry air into the inner core region. Despite the unfavorable environmental conditions, the presence of cooler shelf water just offshore and eyewall replacement cycles, Ivan weakened only slowly and made landfall as a 105 kt hurricane (category 3 on the SSHS; see Figure 2c and Figure 3b.) at approximately 0650 UTC 16 September, just west of Gulf Shores, Alabama. By this time, the eye diameter had increased to 40-50 n mi (Figure 4c), which resulted in some of the strongest winds occurring over a narrow area near the southern Alabama-western Florida panhandle border.
Member Since: August 12, 2007 Posts: 11 Comments: 2413
558. Ivansrvivr 3:46 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Ivan went through eyewall replacement cycle before making landfall. It had weakened but started to restrengthen right before landfall. Look up the WUG hurricane archives. the pressures before landfall were 939, 937, 931. Corresponding max winds were 130, 130, 125. What you are seeing is the end of a weakening and the beginning of a strengthening phase. That explains the very violent conditions as Ivan came ashore. StormW Could probably explain it better but the way I understand a hurricane is when it is strengthening it (metaphorically) "puts it's foot down" strong winds go toward the ground and it becomes more violent. The opposite happens when a hurricane is weakening. It "lifts it's foot up" meaning the strongest winds tend to go aloft. Ivan apparently was putting it's foot down right as it came ashore.
562. SouthDadeFish 3:52 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Yes thats true. Katrina was rapidly weakening in the 18 hours prior to landfall. Regardless they were both very destructive storms. The national hurricane center mentioned something about the weakening trend of gulf hurricanes as they approach the coast in Katrina's tropical cyclone report:

The weakening of major hurricanes as they approach the northern Gulf coast has occurred on several occasions in the past when one 3
or more of these factors have been in place. Indeed, an unpublished study by the National Hurricane Center (NHC) reveals that, during the past 20 years, all 11 hurricanes having a central pressure less than 973 mb 12 h before landfall in the northern Gulf of Mexico weakened during these last 12 h.
Member Since: August 12, 2007 Posts: 11 Comments: 2413
563. Ivansrvivr 3:52 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Note Ivan did start to restrengthen when it took that easterly wobble that put Pensacola in the worst area. Had that wobble not occurred, we wouldn't have took it on the chin.
564. SouthDadeFish 3:52 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Oh wow awesome. Good luck on your studies JFV. take care.
Member Since: August 12, 2007 Posts: 11 Comments: 2413
565. Ivansrvivr 3:55 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
562 You are correct. The strengthening then weakening is caused by storms passing over the "loop current". the L.C "supercharges" tropical systems then they tend to weaken as they move away from it.
566. SouthDadeFish 3:55 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
By the way Ivan, WU's charts show that when Ivan was at 30N, the latitude of Pensacola, Its pressure rose back up to 943. This is probably the weakening trend the NHC is referring to, or at least I assume it to be.
Member Since: August 12, 2007 Posts: 11 Comments: 2413
568. SouthDadeFish 3:58 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Yes I'm quite familiar with the loop current. It fed storms in 2005 such as Katrina and Rita, as well as Opal in 1995 I believe, and many others. It is a good thing there is a shelf of cooler water closer towards the coast or else canes such as Ivan and Katrina may have maintained there category 5 intensity while making landfall. It is a scary thought.
Member Since: August 12, 2007 Posts: 11 Comments: 2413
570. Ivansrvivr 7:05 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
SDF, Remember that Pensacola is inland. Ivan came in at Gulf Shores AL which is 45min in car driving SE Of Pensacola. I made that drive everyday for a month at one point. Ivan was inland at point you are referring to. STL, I was using the WUG archives. The steady pressure drop (in the 930s) in the hours before landfall wouldn't be consistent with sudden rise to 946. Makes me believe that either the NHC reading was taken either before (possibly due to instrument failure which did occur) or away from landfall. That is unpopulated area away from beaches(that were completely gone) in Baldwin & Mobile co AL, as well as the western Part of Escambia Co FL, which had totally lost power 4-5 hours before eye passed to our west. I'm not saying the 946 is wrong, just not consistant with pressures measured before landfall or the scope of damage inflicted. There were so many differing reports after Ivan, there was one group claiming it was only Cat 1 because the peak wind they recorded was 87mph(before the recording devices lost power). Whether it was 930s or 940s it still damaged my eardrums which I will deal with the rest of my life.
571. HadesGodWyvern 9:20 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
RSMC: India Meteorological Department (New Delphi, India)

Tropical Cyclones Outlook (0600z 26APR)
------------------------------------
A low pressure area has formed over southeast Bay of Bengal. In association with the LPA convective clouds are seen over southeast Bay of Bengal and Andaman Sea.

Convective clouds are also seen over southeast Arabian Sea.

Marine Bulletin (0900z 26APR)
------------------------------
A low pressure area persists over southeast Bay of Bengal and surrounding neighborhood.
Member Since: May 24, 2006 Posts: 43 Comments: 36683
572. Ivansrvivr 9:42 AM GMT on April 26, 2008    
571. Those are bigtime flood events. I dont know much about wx over there except about the monsoons. I read tropical systems that develop there are as moisture laden as any in the world. I don't know that for fact though.
573. SAINTHURRIFAN 12:59 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
NOT TO SOUND TRIVIAL BUT THE under play of katrina still continues. if you talk to the the local mets around the ms coast and also the ones that work at keesler airforce base in biloxi, where those famous planes are sationed? katrinas so called rapid weakening after later reports about 3 weeks after the storm was in most peoples opinion done more by the gov with the insurance companies in mind. also i haved lived in this area all my life and have seen storms from camille on. no body thought they would ever see anything come close to camille, they did not they saw worse. as far as mainly a flood issue how does a so called weakened storm have recorded sustained winds of still 110mph in jones county whish is close to laurel which is 125 miles inland lol. also on ivan , i have a condo on orange beach ,al right where it hit so i was able to see ivans wrath and katrinas wrath and it was no contest ivan was amean storm but nothing like katrina. also as far as ivan that are is very lucky it was not as built up in 1979 as it is now for if fredrick would have hit it ivan would just be another story. while all hurricanes can be bad dont find ways of downplaying the worst of all. i would not have opened my mouth but being through camille freddy elena ivan katrina and studying them for years i think i know just a little and the good folks here plus many in the scientific field believe katrina was a 4 in wind strength and certainly a 5 in surge strength.
Member Since: August 20, 2005 Posts: 5 Comments: 668
574. moonlightcowboy 1:21 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
G'morning, everyone!

I'm out on bail, but I've got this thing 'round my ankle! ;P I apologize to WU, Doc and the good bloggers here for the interruption yesterday evening. I let something bother me that I shouldn't have and I let it get out-of-hand. Hopefully, that'll not happen again. Nonetheless, it was a mistake and I regret it. I appreciate the kind, supportive comments sincerely. Thank you - you're a great group!

Now, since there was some talk of eddys, check this out! Appears to be a rather large loop about to spin-off the current! By the time it spins off and the current propagates itself again, it could leave some really warm, potentially explosive waters in the GOM in a few months.


Member Since: July 9, 2006 Posts: 179 Comments: 28117
575. moonlightcowboy 1:26 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
G'morning, everyone!

I'm out on bail, but I've got this thing 'round my ankle! ;P I apologize to WU, Doc and the good bloggers here for the interruption yesterday evening.
I let something bother me that I shouldn't have and I let it get out-of-hand. Hopefully, that'll not happen again. Nonetheless, it was a mistake and I regret it.
I appreciate the kind, supportive comments sincerely. Thank you - you're a great group!

Now, since there was some talk of eddys, check this out! Appears to be a rather large loop about to spin-off the current! By the time it spins off and the current propagates itself again, it could leave some really warm, potentially explosive waters in the GOM in a few months.


Member Since: July 9, 2006 Posts: 179 Comments: 28117
576. pottery 1:29 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Morning, MLC, good to see you.
That warm loop would certainly need to be taken into consideration as we approach June.
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20702
577. moonlightcowboy 1:32 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
G'morning, Pottery! How are things on the point down there?

Yeah, seems like the serious variables are beginning to stack up! ugh!
Member Since: July 9, 2006 Posts: 179 Comments: 28117
578. stormdude77 1:34 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Good morning!

I'm not sure if anyone else noticed, but the warm SSTs anomalies of the African coast, seem to be spreading westward (into the MDR; not good news).

579. moonlightcowboy 1:37 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Wow, yep, Stormdude, they sure are. Glad you posted that. Here we go!
Member Since: July 9, 2006 Posts: 179 Comments: 28117
580. pottery 1:38 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
All is well, MLC. Some cloud about, but not expecting any rain.
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20702
581. pottery 1:40 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Warm eddies in the Gulf, warm SST's spreading westward.
BRACE BRACE BRACE !!
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20702
582. catastropheadjuster 1:42 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
MLC Good morning and to everyone else. I hope we don't get no bad weather today have a block party to go to and it's not so much fun when it's raining and lightning.
Sheri
Member Since: August 24, 2006 Posts: 21 Comments: 3556
583. moonlightcowboy 1:42 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Yeah, I think we could start compiling a list of potentially serious variables! Not looking real sporty right now.
Member Since: July 9, 2006 Posts: 179 Comments: 28117
584. stormdude77 1:44 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Hello MLC and Pottery

Yes MLC... We now have to see how fast the MDR, warms up...
585. pottery 1:45 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Dude77, the cool anomaly around the islands would appear to be strengthening, at the same time. Will they cancell each other out ?
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20702
586. moonlightcowboy 1:47 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Hey, Sheri. Hopefully, you'll miss the bad stuff and you're party will be ok.
Member Since: July 9, 2006 Posts: 179 Comments: 28117
588. pottery 1:52 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
MLC, a list of potential... .etc.
We could call it the DOOMLIST LOL
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20702
589. moonlightcowboy 1:56 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
- Vort, yeah, that doesn't look too good.

- Pottery, "doom list" - ugh! It's the end of April, not too much further, now, and it's here.
Member Since: July 9, 2006 Posts: 179 Comments: 28117
590. extreme236 1:58 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Member Since: August 2, 2007 Posts: 19 Comments: 19234
591. extreme236 1:59 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
The dark orange indicates 27 degrees C and each of the red colors indicates one degree warmer, in case you can't see the numbers at the bottom.

Link
Member Since: August 2, 2007 Posts: 19 Comments: 19234
592. Cavin Rawlins 2:02 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
good morning all
Member Since: July 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
593. extreme236 2:04 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Good morning W456!
Member Since: August 2, 2007 Posts: 19 Comments: 19234
594. pottery 2:06 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Hello, 456. We are looking at water temps.
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20702
595. stormdude77 2:06 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
Morning, W456
596. moonlightcowboy 2:07 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
G'morning, 456! What's the skinny?
Member Since: July 9, 2006 Posts: 179 Comments: 28117
597. weatherfromFlorida 2:12 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
My cool gets cooler every day for some reason.
El Nino? Naw
Member Since: March 22, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 77
598. Drakoen 2:13 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
With a weak A/B tropical waves/developing low tend to go more in a West-Northwest direction from from Africa. Of course, while it is not the CV season yet, 2005 have a 26C isotherm that stretched out to 40W and as far north as 20N. This year still lacks foundation SSTs that even 2006 had with the 26 degree isotherm stretching out to about 50W and as far north as 20N.

This year:
C
Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29010
599. pottery 2:13 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
I'm out for a while. A good day to do some stuff in the garden, with some cloudcover about.
I'll check back later, when the beer is cold.
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20702
600. Ivansrvivr 2:14 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
The chatter this morning is the Loop Current but my gut has been saying the Eastern Seaboard will get the "whammy" this year.
601. Cavin Rawlins 2:15 PM GMT on April 26, 2008    
These two images speak for themselves. The first image was posted by Dr. Jeff Masters on April 13 2008. The second image was issued this past Tuesday. SST were forecast to below normal and now they arte forecast to be above average for much of MDR. In addition to this shear values are already expected to below normal, extremely below normal in some places.

April 13 SST forecast



April 22 SST forecast





Member Since: July 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076

Viewing: 551 - 601

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity