hcubed's WunderBlog

Posted by: hcubed, 1:40 AM GMT on May 21, 2013 +0
...where at least 24 people, including nine children, were killed, the state medical examiner's office said.

Earlier reports of 51 deaths were wrong.

The tornado itself has been upgraded to an EF5 storm.

We'll continue to keep an eye on the news, but I want everyone to be assured of one thing (paraphrasing a comment made in February by Neapolitan):

"...Only a fool would make the claim that this terrible tornado was "caused" by global warming - and only a bigger fool would make the claim that anyone credible will say that. After all, there's a whole world of difference between saying climate change caused a specific weather event and saying climate change made that specific weather event worse. Denialists know that, which is why they desperately work themselves into a lather making lame strawman arguments in the hopes that the lesser-informed won't recognize the difference..."

So let's see how many "informed" people will work themselves up into a lather, trying to make the case that this particular storm was DIRECTLY caused by man's use of evil fossil fuels, using this terrible tragedy to further their "cause", hoping that the lesser-informed won't know the difference.

For now, comments are closed.

I'll re-open them as the fools step forward.
Updated: 11:30 AM GMT on May 22, 2013   Permalink | A A A
Posted by: hcubed, 6:05 AM GMT on May 17, 2013 +0
...and again, a math teacher should have been used.

The main blog article (submitted by Angela Fritz) has the comment:

"...The study published Thursday is the first to take so many papers and authors into account. Doing a search on the popular science article website Web of Science for "climate change" or "global warming" produces over 12,000 results. Of these, 4,014 papers were identified to state a position on climate change. Among those, 3,8...
Updated: 4:19 AM GMT on May 19, 2013   Permalink | A A A
Posted by: hcubed, 12:44 AM GMT on February 12, 2013 +0
As usual, the main blog asks the question:

"...The historic Nor'easter that buried New England under up to 40" of snow Friday and Saturday was the most intense winter storm event on record for southeastern Maine, and second most for Long Island, Connecticut, eastern Massachusetts, and perhaps Rhode Island, writes wunderground's weather historian Christopher C. Burt. His rating was based upon both snowfall amounts and winds. For Long Island and Connecticut...
Updated: 4:41 AM GMT on February 12, 2013   Permalink | A A A
Posted by: hcubed, 2:28 PM GMT on January 07, 2013 +1
"...CANBERRA, Australia -- Australia was bracing on Monday for days of "catastrophic" fire and heat-wave conditions, with fires already burning in five states.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard toured fire-ravaged Tasmanian townships and promised emergency aid for survivors, who told of a "fireball" that engulfed communities across the thinly populated state on Friday and Saturday.

"The trees just exploded," local man Ashley Zanol told Australian ra...
Updated: 2:31 PM GMT on January 07, 2013   Permalink | A A A
Posted by: hcubed, 7:14 PM GMT on January 06, 2013 +0
Well, as an example, let's look at their rainfall forecasts they made during 2012. Remember, their forecasts are based on information from observations, several numerical models and expert judgement.

On 23rd March, they predicted “The forecast for average UK rainfall slightly favours drier than average conditions for April/May/June as a whole, and also slightly favours April being the driest of the 3 months.”

RESULT – RAINFALL TOTALS WER...
  Permalink | A A A

« View Older Entries