Weather Extremes

Record Spring Rain and Snow Pose Major Flood Risks for the West and Missouri River
Posted by: Christopher C. Burt, 9:16 PM GMT on June 02, 2011 +2
Record Spring Rain and Snow Pose Major Flood Risks in the West and along the Missouri River

With the Mississippi River now slowly receding from its record crest at the end of May a new major flood risk is developing along the Missouri River from Montana to Nebraska and snowmelt is likely to create significant flooding in many river valleys and lakes throughout the Rocky Mountain region.

Missouri River Flooding

National Weather Service Hydrologist Mark Fuchs warned on Thursday (June 2nd) that “nearly every reservoir in the Missouri River Basin has been completely used up, with releases from five to six dams on the upper Missouri exceeding 100,000 cubic feet per second (cfs), higher than any of them have ever experienced.” Historic flooding along the length of the river from Montana to Nebraska is likely to rival the record crests observed during the great flood of 1993.



The heaviest observed monthly rainfall on record during May in portions of Montana, combined with the melting of near-record snow packs, is the culprit leading to this situation. Billings, Montana recorded 9.54” in May, obliterating its former single-wettest month on record of 7.71” set in May of 1981 (the average annual precipitation for Billings is just 14.5”!). An all-time 24-hour rainfall of 3.35” was observed on May 24-25 in the city (old record was 3.19” on April 27-28, 1978). Almost every site in eastern Montana, eastern Wyoming, and western South Dakota recorded their wettest May on record. Portions of western North Dakota and eastern Montana have also endured their snowiest winter season on record (including Williston, North Dakota with 107.2” and Glasgow, Montana with 108.6”) and the melting of this has filled local reservoirs to the brim.

Tributaries to the Missouri, such as the Souris River in North Dakota and the North Platte River in Nebraska, are already flooding at all-time record heights.



Any additional rainfall across the region and snow melt from the Montana Rockies will likely cause a record crest to develop on the upper Missouri River that will work its way downstream to the Mississippi at St. Louis sometime later this month. Cities that are likely to be affected by flooding of record proportions include Williston and Bismarck, North Dakota; Pierre, the state capital of South Dakota, Sioux City, Iowa, and even perhaps Kansas City, Missouri.



The Missouri River has already begun to overflow its banks at Sioux City, Iowa as the photo taken on May 31st indicates. Photo from Associated Press.

Below are the flood stage predictions for the Missouri River from Sioux City to St. Charles (where the Missouri River reaches the Mississippi):




The worst flood in modern history of the Missouri River was that of 1993, ironically the same as the last time (previous to this year) that the Mississippi recorded its greatest flood on record. I say ironically because in 1993 the two rivers flooded for the same reason (heavy spring rains) and at the same time, yet this year the two rivers are flooding at different times for slightly different reasons; still because of record spring rains but this time with upstream snow melt more in the equation.

Rocky Mountain Region Flooding Potential

The extraordinary snowfall season of 2010-2011 continues into June for the Central and Northern Rocky Mountain and Intermountain Regions. Ely, Nevada just received an additional 9.0” of snow on May 28-29 breaking the town’s all-time snowiest season on record with a total of 110.4” (amazingly the previous record was just last season with 107.0”—-records go back to 1890). In Colorado the snow depths at the 10,000' snotel locations are still running as high as 169” (14 feet deep!) at Tower site. Even at the relatively low site of Dry Lake at 8,400” the snow is still an impressive 41” deep as of June 2. In Wyoming snow depths are still over 120” (10 feet)at most 10,000-foot snotel sites, and in Utah Snowbird still has 135” on the ground at the 9,640-foot level. The deepest snow in the nation, however, is in California’s Sierra where 181” (15 feet) remains on the ground at Leavitt Lake, 9,400’. Donner Summit has so far recorded over 800” of snow this season with more expected this weekend. Its all-time seasonal snowfall record of 819” (set in 1937-1938) is in jeopardy.

All of this is probably going to melt very quickly this month and send torrents water into the valley streams, rivers, and lakes. Furthermore, low elevation sites such as Salt Lake City have experienced their wettest spring on record: Salt Lake City has just completed its wettest three month (March-May) period on record with 11.73” of precipitation (previous record was 10.39” during March-May 1876). It is very likely that Salt Lake City will see some serious urban flooding later this month. The last big snowmelt flood in the city occurred in May 1983.



Downtown Salt Lake City’s streets turned into rivers in late May and early June 1983 following a rapid warm up that melted deep snow in the Wasatch Mountains. Here pedestrians cross a makeshift bridge at the intersection of State Street and 100 South Street. The Federal Building is in the background. Photo from National Weather Service archives.

The Great Salt Lake is no longer in danger of flooding since pumps were installed on the west side of the lake in 1987 to pump water into the desert.

To keep track of the coming floods in the West and along the Missouri River follow wunderground.com's severe weather alerts page for the latest information.
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 1 - 15

Page: 1 — Blog Index

1. Snowfire 1:46 AM GMT on June 03, 2011    
Is the situation on the Missouri of any consequence for the region south of St. Louis?
Member Since: June 29, 2005 Posts: 24 Comments: 300
2. Christopher C. Burt, Weather Historian
2:06 AM GMT on June 03, 2011
   
Quoting Snowfire:
Is the situation on the Missouri of any consequence for the region south of St. Louis?


Good question.

I think not, since unlike 1993 the two rivers are peaking at different times, so the downstream flooding of the Missouri River should not have an adverse effect on the Mississippi except, perhaps, to slightly delay the receding waters of the latter.

Of course, should June provide additional exceptional rainfall to the basins of either river then all bets are off. But one must think of these two great rivers as 'macro-systems' and even heavy new rainfall in the affected regions probably won't make too much of a difference so far as the Mississippi is concerned.
Member Since: February 15, 2006 Posts: 159 Comments: 161
4. DakeMisc 11:19 PM GMT on June 03, 2011    
So far, we've been fortunate here in the Bismarck, ND area. The fast flowing of the river is scouring out the sand banks/silting that have been building in the river for years, and also eroding the banks. Consequently the river channel is now deeper and able to hold more water so the flooding has been minimal--at the moment. But since the river will be flowing like this, and faster, for months, it'll be interesting to see what happens here, downstream and how it affects the Mississippi.

Bismarck and Mandan (across the river from each other) have been building dikes and sandbagging all week. There has been a tremendous outpouring of community effort. There's a 'flood event' map here
http://bismarck.org/DocumentView.aspx?DID=3861
showing which areas have been diked and which will be flooding.
Member Since: September 15, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 30
5. snotly 1:38 AM GMT on June 04, 2011    
There is an area near St. Louis called Chesterfield that flooded back in '93. Since then the area was supposed to have not been redeveloped since it lies on the Missouri flood plain. I'm not sure if they have reinforced the levee system there, but the area is heavily developed now with a large Walmart and many million dollar buildings, its kind of a ritzy area now. I'm thinking that they figured a '93 flood only happens every 500 years or so along the Missouri. They may have gotten it wrong.
Member Since: August 27, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 668
6. beell 5:06 AM GMT on June 04, 2011    
Hi, Chris,
You made me go link hunting again!

Just a whole diiferent kind of flood fight than we saw on the Mississippi. Didn't really have to worry about lakes and dams and snow!
(click any graphic to open in a new window)



This National Weather Service chart shows how repeated rounds of heavy rain (300 to 600 percent of normal), over the last 60 days, coupled with record plains snowpack have pushed the Missouri River Reservoirs to very high levels nearly filling the reservoirs, reducing any flexibility built into our operations for 2011 and requiring aggressive and historic releases out of the main stem reservoirs. This Map shows the observed amount of rainfall over the lst 60 days. The mustard yellow color over almost all of Montana indicates rainfall between 10 and 15 inches during that 60 day period. Nearly all the water falling in that area flows into either the Fort Peck Dam in Montana or the Garrison Dam in North Dakota.




This chart shows how the rainfall over the lst 60 days is outside the normal conditions for the same timeframe. The light blue, dark blue and purple colors over almost all of Montana and western North Dakota and eastern Wyoming indicates precipitation starting at 150 percent to 600 percent more than what is normal during that 60 day timeframe. Nearly all the water falling in that area flows into either the Fort Peck Dam in Montana or the Garrison Dam in North Dakota.
US Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District's Photos - National Weather Service Products






Mountain Snowpack as of May 1, 2011 (Percent of Average (1971-2000)
National Water and Climate Center - Snowpack
Member Since: September 11, 2007 Posts: 125 Comments: 12881
7. TomTaylor 8:09 AM GMT on June 04, 2011    
Thanks for the blog.

it has been an amazing year for weather records in the united states, from tornadoes to floods to snow its been a wild ride and it ain't over yet
Member Since: August 24, 2010 Posts: 18 Comments: 3899
8. MartinMg 8:22 AM GMT on June 04, 2011    
Thanks for the info:)
Member Since: December 4, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 11
9. mspelto 10:55 AM GMT on June 04, 2011    
The snowmelt in Montana's rockies will not impact the downstream high flow levels as quickly as the North Platte River will, just due to river distance to travel. The North Platte snowpack is listed today as 146 % and 119 % of normal for the two main basins. If we look at the snodas snowmelt model for the last 72 hours for the area it shows a total snowmelt of 1.4-2.0 inches of snow water equivalent. This is higher than Montana for the same period.
http://www.nohrsc.noaa.gov/interactive/html/map.h tml
Member Since: January 9, 2011 Posts: 0 Comments: 3
11. Snowfire 7:29 PM GMT on June 04, 2011    
Quoting snotly:
There is an area near St. Louis called Chesterfield that flooded back in '93. Since then the area was supposed to have not been redeveloped since it lies on the Missouri flood plain. I'm not sure if they have reinforced the levee system there, but the area is heavily developed now with a large Walmart and many million dollar buildings, its kind of a ritzy area now. I'm thinking that they figured a '93 flood only happens every 500 years or so along the Missouri. They may have gotten it wrong.


Chesterfield may be in slightly better shape this time around, because the Mississippi is not as high and it won't back up so much as then; but I know what you mean about the development. Back in the 1980s, it was just corn fields down there; now it's an industrial corridor. Maybe they're banking on federal flood insurance to bail them out.

As to the intervals of these big floods, let's see..1954..1973..1993..2011..hmmm, hardly 500-year intervals here, hello?
Member Since: June 29, 2005 Posts: 24 Comments: 300
12. PrivateIdaho 8:53 PM GMT on June 05, 2011    
The upper Snake River could hit record levels if we get a rapid warm up in the next few weeks. It's 80 here today.
Photobucket
Member Since: August 29, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 5211
13. PrivateIdaho 8:56 PM GMT on June 05, 2011    
Already getting some flooding.

Photobucket
Member Since: August 29, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 5211
14. PrivateIdaho 8:58 PM GMT on June 05, 2011    
Photobucket
Member Since: August 29, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 5211
15. Jelf 9:48 PM GMT on June 18, 2011    
Below is a link to an enhanced Google map covering the Missouri River. Click a symbol for current river flows and forecasts.

To zoom to a location, click Menu ==> Search and enter that location.

To see a detailed topographic map, click Hybrid ==> MyTopo.

http://www.mappingsupport.com/p/gmap4.php?q=https ://sites.google.com/site/gmap4files/p/news/missour i_river.txt&ll=43.761599,-101.071993&t=h&z=6&label =on

Joseph Elfelt
Redmond, WA
Member Since: June 18, 2011 Posts: 0 Comments: 3

Viewing: 1 - 15

Page: 1 — Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About weatherhistorian
Christopher C. Burt is the author of 'Extreme Weather; A Guide and Record Book'. He studied meteorology at the Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.

Community Activity