Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Oil enters the Loop Current and is headed to the Florida Keys
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 7:38 PM GMT on May 17, 2010 +8
Satellite imagery today from NASA's MODIS instrument confirms that a substantial tongue of oil has moved southeast from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and entered the Gulf of Mexico's Loop Current. The Loop Current is an ocean current that transports warm Caribbean water through the Yucatan Channel between Cuba and Mexico. The current flows northward into the Gulf of Mexico, then loops southeastward just south of the Florida Keys (where it is called the Florida Current), and then along the west side of the western Bahamas. Here, the waters of the Loop Current flow northward along the U.S. coast and become the Gulf Stream. Once oil gets into the Loop Current, the 1 - 2 mph speed of the current should allow the oil to travel the 500 miles to the Florida Keys in 10 - 20 days. Portions of the Loop Current flow at speed up to 4 mph, so the transport could be just 4 - 5 days. It now appears likely that the first Florida beaches to see oil from the spill will be in the Lower Florida Keys, not in the Panhandle.


Figure 1. Satellite image of the oil spill taken at 12:40 EDT Monday May 17, 2010. The location of the Loop Current is superimposed. Image credit: University of Wisconsin and NASA.

Why is oil getting into the Loop Current?
The winds over the oil spill location are offshore out of the northwest today, and offshore winds will continue intermittently through Wednesday, which should allow a substantial amount of oil to enter the Loop Current. The major reason oil is moving southwards is because of the instability of the currents in the Gulf of Mexico. The Loop Current is not a stable feature, and tends to surge northwards and southwards in a chaotic fashion, and in response to changes in the prevailing winds. Over the past week, chaotic behavior of the Loop Current and a clockwise-rotating eddy just to its north, just south of the oil spill location, have combined to bring a current of southward-moving surface water to the oil spill location. As strong on-shore winds from the southeast slackened this past weekend, oil has been drawn southward into the Loop Current. The latest NOAA trajectory forecasts failed to anticipate the movement of the oil into the Loop Current. The latest surface current forecasts from NOAA's HYCOM model show that oil could continue pouring into the Loop Current for most of the rest of the week. It is highly uncertain how diluted the oil might get on its voyage to northwestern Cuba and the Florida Keys this week, but the possibility for a major ecological disaster in the fragile Keys ecosystem cannot be ruled out. Southeast to east winds of 10 - 15 knots are expected to develop late this week and extend into early next week, which may be strong enough to impose a surface current that will shut off the flow of oil into the Loop Current by Friday or Saturday.


Figure 2. Forecast made at 8pm EDT Sunday May 16, 2010, of the Gulf of Mexico currents by NOAA's HYCOM model. A persistent southward flowing surface current is predicted to occur this week between the oil spill location (red dot) and the Loop Current. Image credit: NOAA.

Likely areas of impact
Based on a study of 194 floating probes released into the Northeast Gulf of Mexico during a 1-year study in the 1990s (Figure 3), the west coast of Florida from Tampa Bay southwards to the Everglades is at minimal risk of receiving oil from surface currents. There is a "forbidden zone" off the southwest Florida coast where the shape of the coast, bottom configuration, and prevailing winds all act to create upwelling and surface currents that tend to take water away from the coast. This study implies that the greatest risk of land impacts by surface oil caught in the Loop Current is along the ocean side of the Florida Keys, and along the coast of Southeast Florida from Miami to West Palm Beach. Eddies breaking away from the Gulf Stream would also likely bring oil to northwest Cuba, the western Bahamas, and the U.S. East Coast as far north as Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, though at lesser concentrations. Southwest Florida cannot rest entirely, though--the "forbidden zone" is only true for surface waters, and there is onshore flow below the surface. Since recent ship measurements have detected substantial plumes of oil beneath the surface, southwest Florida might be at risk if one of these plumes gets entrained into the Loop Current. These subsurface plumes were also detected by current probes launched into the oil spill on May 8 by one of NOAA's hurricane hunter aircraft, according to one scientist I spoke to at last week's AMS hurricane conference. There are plans for the Hurricane Hunters to go out again tomorrow and drop more probes into the spill to attempt to get a better handle on where the oil is and where the currents are taking it.


Figure 3. Paths of 194 floating probes released into the yellow-outlined area in the northeast Gulf of Mexico between February 1996 and February 1997 as part of a study by the Mineral Management Service (MMS). The probes were all launched into waters with depth between 20 and 60 meters. Image credit: Yang, H., R.H. Weisberga, P.P. Niilerb, W. Sturgesc, and W. Johnson, 1999, Lagrangian circulation and forbidden zone on the West Florida Shelf, Continental Shelf Research Volume 19, Issue 9, July 1999, Pages 1221-1245 doi:10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00021-7

When will a Loop Current eddy break off?
Every 6 - 11 months, the looped portion of the Loop Current cuts off into a clockwise-rotating ring of water that then slowly drifts west-southwest towards Texas. When one of these rings breaks off at the peak of hurricane season, it provides a source of heat energy capable of providing fuel for rapid intensification of any hurricanes that might cross over. The Loop Current is not predicted to shed an ring over the next month, as predicted by the latest 1-month forecast from the U.S. Navy. However, the last eddy broke off in July of 2009, ten month ago, and it is unusual for the Loop Current to go more than eleven months without shedding an eddy. I expect we'll see the Loop Current shed an eddy in July or August, just in time to pose the maximum threat for hurricane season. According to an interesting February 2004 article published by offshore-engineer.com, reliable forecasts of these currents and eddies are not available yet. Keep in mind that surface currents are largely driven by winds, and wind forecasts are not reliable out more than about 10 days.

References
Yang, H., R.H. Weisberga, P.P. Niilerb, W. Sturgesc, and W. Johnson, 1999, Lagrangian circulation and forbidden zone on the West Florida Shelf, Continental Shelf Research Volume 19, Issue 9, July 1999, Pages 1221-1245 doi:10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00021-7.

Oil spill resources
NOAA trajectory forecasts
University of South Florida Ocean Circulation Group oil spill forecasts
ROFFS Deepwater Horizon page
Surface current forecasts from NOAA's HYCOM model
HYCOM ocean current forecasts from LSU

Jeff Masters
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 301 - 351

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22Blog Index

301. xcool 10:32 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Member Since: September 26, 2009 Posts: 2 Comments: 15526
302. MiamiHurricanes09 10:32 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:
We basically have two areas to watch this weekend into next week. I would expect just one so early in the season.
Yeah I agree, and if we get 2 in May, that will not be a good sign of things to come. The one in the SW Caribbean I think will be the one that if it does happen will develop.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 20002
303. HadesGodWyvern 10:32 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Oh I've been around. It has just been that slow this month with posting tropical information.
Member Since: May 24, 2006 Posts: 43 Comments: 36927
304. Levi32 10:33 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting TampaSpin:


StormW the SST's are not that high there either yet. SubTropical system is best but, possibly a Tropical Depression at most.



Except that subtropical systems don't require as much heat from the ocean to sustain themselves, since they have the benefit of steeper lapse rates due to cold pockets aloft. That's why the approximate SST threshold for a subtropical storm is only 23C.
Member Since: November 24, 2005 Posts: 593 Comments: 25605
305. MiamiHurricanes09 10:34 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Levi32:
This is the tightest-looking tropical low the GFS has spit out yet this season.

Yup thats not good. And the consistancy it has had with it doesn't make things better.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 20002
307. TampaSpin 10:35 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Levi32:


Except that subtropical systems don't require as much heat from the ocean to sustain themselves, since they have the benefit of steeper lapse rates due to cold pockets aloft. That's why the approximate SST threshold for a subtropical storm is only 23C.


LOL.......that's what i said a SubTropical system is most likely...its ok!
Member Since: September 2, 2007 Posts: 176 Comments: 19767
308. MiamiHurricanes09 10:35 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Im not liking that the GFS is taking the low in the SW Caribbean to Haiti, they don't need that at all.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 20002
309. Stormchaser2007 10:36 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Interesting system.

18z GFS 168 hours




Member Since: June 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15294
310. Levi32 10:37 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
Yup thats not good. And the consistancy it has had with it doesn't make things better.


I'm not quite buying it yet though. The subtropical jet would be right to its north during that time giving it no room. It's going to take longer than that to get an upper ridge to build over the Caribbean. I'd give it a few more days...the GFS looks too fast.
Member Since: November 24, 2005 Posts: 593 Comments: 25605
311. Hurricanes101 10:39 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    


228 hours
Member Since: March 10, 2010 Posts: 1 Comments: 6930
312. reedzone 10:39 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting TampaSpin:


LOL.......that's what i said a SubTropical system is most likely...its ok!


Agreed! Waters are too cold for a pure tropical transition but getting 2 named systems would definitely be setting for a rather activ season.
Member Since: July 1, 2008 Posts: 13 Comments: 7249
313. Cavin Rawlins 10:40 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Hurricanes101:


228 hours


The GFS takes it the same direction as the ECMWF.
Member Since: July 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
315. MiamiHurricanes09 10:42 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
I know this won't happen but at 324 hours the GFS takes the SW caribbean low all the way to the top of the map with a pressure of 999 MB. I think its pretty funny.

Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 20002
316. Levi32 10:42 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting reedzone:


Agreed! Waters are too cold for a pure tropical transition but getting 2 named systems would definitely be setting for a rather activ season.


It can be, but not always. Remember 2009 had a TD and 2 invests before June. What will be a sign of an active season to come is if we get a storm in June with roots in the African wave train coming out of the deep tropics and developing in the Caribbean. If you get that, then it's usually a sign of an active season, but spontaneous developments, especially those outside of the deep tropics, aren't as much of an indicator.

The trough-splits though are a product of the developing La Nina, which can foreshadow a favorable development pattern later in the season.
Member Since: November 24, 2005 Posts: 593 Comments: 25605
317. doabarrelroll 10:44 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
.
Member Since: November 8, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 486
318. weathergeek5 10:44 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
watch this



Member Since: December 25, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 1729
319. Beachfoxx 10:45 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Nobody knows where the oils going to go... we've lived that for almost 3 weeks now. We were told to prepare, we attended meetings & classes - and thankfully, thus far we've had no oil or tar balls invade our pristine white sand beaches. The Gulf currents, temps, salinity, winds, wave action, etc... and probably the "kind" of oil leaking all play a part in determining the path the oil plume is taking. Even the experts seem to agree to disagree as to the trajectory the oil is going to take. Time will tell.
Quoting atmoaggie:

But, by looking at the four-panel (all 4 current models available), I'd say the global HyCOM probably has the most reasonable currents for the duration of the forecast. (though surely not to be considered perfect)

SABGOM has SSTs less than 21 C right by the loop current by the end of the run...!?! Bullshevitz!

And the relative densities (read temps and salinity) have a lot to do with currents in the gulf (and anywhere else, for that matter).



Go here: http://ocg6.marine.usf.edu/~liu/oil_spill_ensemble_forecast.html and check the whole loop and see how oddly that particular one handles it...
Member Since: July 10, 2005 Posts: 154 Comments: 29287
320. MiamiHurricanes09 10:45 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Levi32:


I'm not quite buying it yet though. The subtropical jet would be right to its north during that time giving it no room. It's going to take longer than that to get an upper ridge to build over the Caribbean. I'd give it a few more days...the GFS looks too fast.
The GFS always rushes things, nothing new.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 20002
321. HurricaneSwirl 10:46 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Levi32:


It can be, but not always. Remember 2009 had a TD and 2 invests before June. What will be a sign of an active season to come is if we get a storm in June with roots in the African wave train coming out of the eastern Atlantic and developing in the Caribbean. If you get that, then it's usually a sign of an active season, but spontaneous developments aren't as much of an indicator.

The trough-splits though are a product of the developing La Nina, which can foreshadow a favorable development pattern later in the season.


I agree.

2007 had two named storms before June and that year had a total of 15 named storms.

2005 didn't have any named storms before June. In fact, it didn't have one until after the first week of June. That year had a total of 28 named storms. I think it was 31 counting depressions.

Member Since: July 7, 2008 Posts: 2 Comments: 3237
322. reedzone 10:46 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Levi32:


It can be, but not always. Remember 2009 had a TD and 2 invests before June. What will be a sign of an active season to come is if we get a storm in June with roots in the African wave train coming out of the deep tropics and developing in the Caribbean. If you get that, then it's usually a sign of an active season, but spontaneous developments, especially those outside of the deep tropics, aren't as much of an indicator.

The trough-splits though are a product of the developing La Nina, which can foreshadow a favorable development pattern later in the season.


Thats true, I appreciate your analysis today, helped me figure out the warm/cold core solutions.
Member Since: July 1, 2008 Posts: 13 Comments: 7249
323. doabarrelroll 10:46 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Hurricanes101:


228 hours


I am concerned that the GFS might be under doing the shear especially past the 6 day mark. Remember last year the GFS had monster storm after monster storm hitting or sitting off of the east coast when in reality the GFS was under doing the sheer past 6 days.
Member Since: November 8, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 486
324. Bordonaro 10:46 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
On a Severe Weather note, I live in Arlington, TX.

A cluster of very strong thunderstorms, with 45MPH winds and 2"/hr rainfall rates are moving in from the west, at about 20 MPH. Of course, everything is flooding, lots of lightning and thunder!!

Nothing like getting about 1/4 of your monthly rainfall in about an hour. Gotta love North TX weather :o)!!
Member Since: August 25, 2009 Posts: 20 Comments: 6785
325. MiamiHurricanes09 10:47 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Acemmett90:

i know
Hey Ace! Where's the Shaq-cane? lol.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 20002
326. Levi32 10:48 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
I'm out for a bit, later all.
Member Since: November 24, 2005 Posts: 593 Comments: 25605
327. BahaHurican 10:48 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Floodman:
Quoting TampaSpin:
Floodman is correct! This did not and should not have happened if our Government and the Oil industry took the what if positions more serious. The oil industry was not looked upon as a serious threat to the Ecological Environment. Our Gov. would rather regulate what you and i do on a day to day basis than something far more harmful as the Oil Company and that has been going on for many years.


Well said, but knowing your political leanings I will qualify this: it's all administrations...as long as corporate entities and the people that are connected to them are allowed to finance politicians there will be no oversight of these things...it spoke volumes to me to see that Haliburton was involved with this debacle...after having been found in no small degree responsible for a blowout on a rig near Australia in the last twelve months...they were hired to do exctly waht they were hired to do here: pour the plugs and monitor the backfuill of mud. In Australia, if memory serves, they were found to have used approximately 30% of the concrete estimated to be needed to plug that well...
I see I wasn't the only one to respond to the Halliburton name in ths fiasco.... My instinct with this is that, no Halliburton involvement, no oil disaster. If you are right about the earlier situation, I wouldn't be surprised if the problem with the blowout preventer had something to do with that concrete also.... yet it seems as if Halliburton is tiptoeing off while BP carries the public approbation. While BP cannot be absolved of responsibility, it would be great if somehow this defective Halliburton company would meet its demise. It seems that wherever they are involved, there is mischief, mayhem, and madness....
Member Since: October 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17961
329. sebastianflorida 10:49 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
Yeah I agree, and if we get 2 in May, that will not be a good sign of things to come. The one in the SW Caribbean I think will be the one that if it does happen will develop.
From my research, I find very little correlation as to how early the first storm forms and how active the season ends up; in fact many seasons with May storms end up pretty near average.
Member Since: August 5, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 513
331. Cavin Rawlins 10:49 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Levi32:


It can be, but not always. Remember 2009 had a TD and 2 invests before June. What will be a sign of an active season to come is if we get a storm in June with roots in the African wave train coming out of the deep tropics and developing in the Caribbean. If you get that, then it's usually a sign of an active season, but spontaneous developments, especially those outside of the deep tropics, aren't as much of an indicator.

The trough-splits though are a product of the developing La Nina, which can foreshadow a favorable development pattern later in the season.


correct!
Member Since: July 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
332. troy1993 10:53 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Hey Levi32..so what is your outlook on the 2010 Atlantic Hurricane Season and do you think that we could see a lot of Cape-Verde storms like we did in 1995 hitting the East Coast?
Member Since: July 29, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 204
333. TampaSpin 10:56 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting lickitysplit:
It sure is a good thing Bush/Cheney got rid of all those pesky, oppressive government regulations on the fossil fuel industry. Phew!!!



Just so those that don't know the facts!


This is what the Obama Admin. did....so keep slinging the mud.....OK!


BP submitted its drilling plan to the MMS on March 10, 2009. Rather than subject the plan to a detailed environmental review before approving it as required by the National Environmental Policy Act, the agency declared the plan to be “categorically excluded” from environmental analysis because it posed virtually no chance of harming the environment.

Obama Could Have Prevented the Deepwater Horizon Disaster
Member Since: September 2, 2007 Posts: 176 Comments: 19767
334. Stormchaser2007 10:56 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting troy1993:
Hey Levi32..so what is your outlook on the 2010 Atlantic Hurricane Season and do you think that we could see a lot of Cape-Verde storms like we did in 1995 hitting the East Coast?


You mean avoiding the East Coast?
Member Since: June 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15294
336. mikatnight 10:58 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
#331 - Guess I haven't been paying enough attention. Developing La Nina? So it's more than just forecast now?
Member Since: October 18, 2005 Posts: 3 Comments: 2180
337. troy1993 11:00 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
well i meant could we see a lot of storms forming in the Cape-Verde region like we did in 1995 but instead of avoiding the East Coast hitting the East Coast/Florida.
Member Since: July 29, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 204
338. reedzone 11:01 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting TampaSpin:



Just so those that don't know the facts!


This is what the Obama Admin. did....so keep slinging the mud.....OK!


BP submitted its drilling plan to the MMS on March 10, 2009. Rather than subject the plan to a detailed environmental review before approving it as required by the National Environmental Policy Act, the agency declared the plan to be “categorically excluded” from environmental analysis because it posed virtually no chance of harming the environment.

Obama Could Have Prevented the Deepwater Horizon Disaster


Exactly Tampaspin, Obama cares more about other countries then the USA. People love to blame republicans for something both the democrats and the republicans did.
Member Since: July 1, 2008 Posts: 13 Comments: 7249
339. GeoffreyWPB 11:02 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
I am more worried about a 2004 type season, as far as steering factors go. Frances and Jeanne wreaked havoc in our neck of the woods.
Member Since: September 10, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 9248
340. Yahuekano 11:02 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting weathergeek5:
watch this



AWSOME!
Member Since: May 16, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 17
341. MiamiHurricanes09 11:03 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting GeoffreyWPB:
I am more worried about a 2004 type season, as far as steering factors go. Frances and Jeanne wreaked havoc in our neck of the woods.
Search up 1964, if we get a similar season to that, that will really suck.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 20002
342. belizeit 11:03 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
This system off of honduras is starting to look like a north easter and the shear over the system has already dropped 20 knots today .
Member Since: January 10, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 843
343. Cavin Rawlins 11:04 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
1995 had a La Nina which explains the storm numbers, it also had a positive NAO phase, which explains the storm tracks. 1995 shouldn't be really used as an analogy because of these two cases. 2010 have a weakening El Nino, going neutral with a 35% chance of La Nina and a negative NAO.
Member Since: July 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
344. MiamiHurricanes09 11:07 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    


Raining pretty bad here in Miami.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 20002
345. ElConando 11:08 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Pretty Nasty Rainstorm came through here. Hardest Rain i've seen in weeks.
Member Since: September 6, 2009 Posts: 2 Comments: 3709
346. Cavin Rawlins 11:08 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
1998 and 2005 are the best analogies. You can looked at the long trek of Georges and the intensity of Mitch as analogs for this year. Number numbers and tracks similar to 2005. The reason being is that conditions in April were similar to these two years.
Member Since: July 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
347. ProduceBoy 11:08 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:
1995 had a La Nina which explains the storm numbers, it also had a positive NAO phase, which explains the storm tracks. 1995 shouldn't be really used as an analogy because of these two cases. 2010 have a weakening El Nino, going neutral with a 35% chance of La Nina and a negative NAO.


I'm glad you clarified the difference between 1995's conditions and the current conditions. Is there a website to find the NAO current level or measurement?
Member Since: August 10, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 35
348. weathergeek5 11:10 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting Bordonaro:
On a Severe Weather note, I live in Arlington, TX.

A cluster of very strong thunderstorms, with 45MPH winds and 2"/hr rainfall rates are moving in from the west, at about 20 MPH. Of course, everything is flooding, lots of lightning and thunder!!

Nothing like getting about 1/4 of your monthly rainfall in about an hour. Gotta love North TX weather :o)!!


Hey i saw your post on the eruption blog.
Member Since: December 25, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 1729
349. Cavin Rawlins 11:10 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting ProduceBoy:


I'm glad you clarified the difference between 1995's conditions and the current conditions. Is there a website to find the NAO current level or measurement?


This is my NAO bible site LINK
Member Since: July 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
350. TampaSpin 11:11 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Just so the blog understands this years Tropical season will not be the worst season of the upcoming 2 seasons as they will be the probably the more severe than this year! But, it only takes 1 storm to be considered a bad year. But in pure numbers this will likely be the less amount of named storms than the upcoming next 2 years.
Member Since: September 2, 2007 Posts: 176 Comments: 19767
351. Twinkster 11:15 PM GMT on May 17, 2010    
Quoting TampaSpin:
Just so the blog understands this years Tropical season will not be the worst season of the upcoming 2 seasons as they will be the probably the more severe than this year! But, it only takes 1 storm to be considered a bad year. But in pure numbers this will likely be the less amount of named storms than the upcoming next 2 years.


just curious as of what makes you think the next 2 seasons after this will be worse
Member Since: June 7, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 932

Viewing: 301 - 351

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity